Yes, the last I heard you could at all except BLT and now GCV.
Thanks Kat,
Chris
Yes, the last I heard you could at all except BLT and now GCV.
I think most of the folks who are upset about the increased ceiling are folks who are worried about running out of points by the time they get a chance to buy....
I am waiting to buy until we go to Disneyland the first part of March because I want to get the AP incentive, but I must admit to a little anxiety about waiting... It meant enough to me to have the opportunity to get founding member status that we visited CA to buy our BLT contract, so I don't want to squander my opportunity... But...Aren't there a million points available (or is it more?)? Do you know how many founding members there are?
How long do you think before they will sell out?
Have you told your guide that you plan on purchasing in March? I'd advise you to have them start writing up the paperwork and confirm you are getting the AP incentive. The APs have to be activated by June 30, 2009. My understanding from my guide is that they will only be offering the AP incentive until their batch of APs run out. I received AP vouchers from the same batch when I purchased my original contract in Dec 2007...
Obviously that could change, but that is the current understanding...
I will speak to my guide about the flexibility of when the AP's need to be activated. I have AP's that don't expire until 8/24/09 and it would be wasteful to activate it several months before the old ones expire. Is the 6/30/09 date set in stone?
Have you told your guide that you plan on purchasing in March?
Are you saying you assumed you'd be able to buy 25 points cash or 50 pts financed because that was what was available at all other resorts at the time?![]()
I say implied b/c what the contract stated was that a person who signed would be allowed an opportunity to become a founding member and would be allowed to purchase "up to 160" points. There wasn't a stated minimum - only max. It did not state that you would be allowed to purchase the resort minimum up to 160 points and it did not state you would be allowed to purchase 100-160 points. Now, it also could be construed to mean you could purchase one point but discussions were always that you would be able to purchase 25-160 - the same minimum that had always been required from day one. (From the boards I have heard that there was a 50 pt minimum for non-home resorts for awhile, but the fact it was dropped to 25 supports implication in the FM contract IMO).
I also use the word implied b/c I think it was much more than an assumption because of the long standing history. I supposed you could have an argument that it was anything less than 160 that would be allowed for purchase. Also, keep in mind that most of these options to become founding member contracts were signed long before BLT's minimum increase was even announced.
Are you saying you assumed you'd be able to buy 25 points cash or 50 pts financed because that was what was available at all other resorts at the time?
Are you saying you assumed you'd be able to buy 25 points cash or 50 pts financed because that was what was available at all other resorts at the time?
It was your assumption based on past history, that's fair. Once BLT was announced as 100 pt min, that assumption should have changed immediately.I am saying that everyone assumed that since the agreement says you may purchase "up to 160 points". No minimum and the maxiumum was equal to the required buy in for new members. My guide was even telling me 25 points up until the sale started. Every guide I spoke to said it. And from a few other comments I've heard I think that DVD even was planning that when they did these agreements. I also call it more than an assumption with approximately 17 years of history behind the point purchase levels and for me the word assumption just doesn't have quite enough strength behind it.
There have been many complaints about this change from people who had received the opportunity to become founding members.
Would your thoughts have been different?
It was your assumption based on past history, that's fair. Once BLT was announced as 100 pt min, that assumption should have changed immediately.
It was a reasonable assumption when there was no indication otherwise. Once BLT was announced at 100 min, that should have at least raised the question. However, I don't think they ever stated anything that GCV would be available at under 100 points, only that the maximum was in place, which was later changed. Thus I don't think think they had any commitment or implied obligation to sell for the lower numbers.Actually I didn't really begin to doubt it until they announced the changing of the maximum purchase allowed - but that wasn't to long after they changed the BLT minimum. And considering they started BLT at less than 100 and gave a notice of the change to allow purchases I continued to hope they would honor how they had been selling this incentive.
Lesson learned.
So what do people here think [OPINION / speculation] - will BLT & VGC ever go (back) to a 25 / 50 point minimum add-on for the general membership? (NOT counting the temporary BLT 25s being reported elsewhere as they are apparently only for a small group of members.)
Has your opinion changed, and if so, why?
I'm starting to have my doubts. I had been hoping it might happen March 25th, just with NO incentives for less than 100. I was guessing that the 100 minimum may have been mainly for the founder period. If there is enough demand at that level, disney makes more on larger contracts than multiple smaller ones due to overhead per contract, so there is rationele weather I like it or not.
Now I'm thinking that (me) buying two 50s at the same $5 off and cruise or DPs for 100 plus as is going on now for Founders is probably the most likely 'minimum' scenerio... I must admit there is a growing part of me that would really like to take a 3 night cruise for DW's BD Feb. 4th!
THEY HAVE CHANGED THE RULES!! Please defer to this thread..http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?p=30377564#post30377564
It was a reasonable assumption when there was no indication otherwise. Once BLT was announced at 100 min, that should have at least raised the question. However, I don't think they ever stated anything that GCV would be available at under 100 points, only that the maximum was in place, which was later changed. Thus I don't think think they had any commitment or implied obligation to sell for the lower numbers.
Now.....with the reported drop in minimum at BLT back to 25 I guess I may assume that GCV will follow suit!?!Meetings at DVD must be pretty interesting these days.