TheFloatingBear
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2016
- Messages
- 3,285
No I was being sincere. But it doesn't mean that your choice of words shouldn't noted when we are talking about people's written reactions which is what we were talking about. You used pixie dust and soiled shoes while mentioned being at the front desk awaiting something.
I was when I responded to you attempting to ease your concerns. But based on your comments honestly I'm not sure you were looking for actual advice because when I gave it to you more of what came out what other things not actually related to what I was commenting on...I'm not sure if you were instead looking for someone to lead the charge with you. I really don't mean any sort of offense here but it seemed like to me you made your comment about packing extra shoes and pixie dust and soiled shoes and front desk more of trying to make a point.
It's not that isn't not a significant new concerns it's that if you said "I always pack extra shoes just in case I step in something gross while at the parks now I have to think more about that with dog poop" and didn't follow up with pixie dust and soiled shoes part I probably wouldn't have even said anything because I get that added layer of stress can make quite a difference.
Instead you came at it like you've never thought before about what you could possibly step in on any given day at the parks and so I came at it from a "if you didn't before you probably don't have to now". Some of the comments here I'm thinking are people just not actually considering what exposures they may have had before. It makes sense to have the mentality. It's not like I thought really hard about a deer peeing in my backyard until I saw it happen. It may very well be that people are seeing something common to their everyday lives suddenly crop up with a new policy (which again the notice truly does bite). Doesn't make your concern any less valid but my point was your concern as well as other people's concerns existed long before the policy was announced.
And believe it or not I can understand how frustrating it must be. But I'm also not on one side or the other in this new policy here on this thread so my approach may not be the same as someone who is only on the one side that is the majority in this thread.
ETA: I should mention I wasn't offended at all so no worries on thatAnd please don't take offense to my comments either as I really am not intending them to be that way.
I've taken your words at face value, perhaps you could consider taking mine as well - I really was venting and troubleshooting. I have gathered a lot of good information on this thread - and read a lot of different perspectives on both sides that have opened my eyes - to help prepare me for my trip. Maybe one of my posts has helped someone, maybe not. Again with my shoe issue - I hear what you're saying, and it is true I haven't felt like wrecking my shoes has been a big worry before (I've pretty much avoided everything but sticky bathrooms), which is why it felt like a new worry now. I might have thought about stepping in other stuff at my resort before, but I hadn't expected dog poop. Maybe I should have been more concerned about the other stuff and have just gotten lucky. I've explained it before so I won't go all into it again, but there it is...I was not consciously trying to make a point, but I'm sure my frustration at my cumulative thoughts about (1) how this was rolled out (2) policies that appear lax and difficult to enforce (3) reports that Disney was "surprised" given the rollout that people had so many concerns, (4) how it was directly affecting me, (5) that it didn't seem like things were thought through, etc. may have been reflected in my words.
I'm not sure what you meant about leading the charge? With the shoes and the front desk? I truly was not being literal about that. But for me, this change does add some new concerns in my specific situation, some of which I mentioned in that original post. Again I use the watching other people's kids thing - a position I've never been in before in Disney. There might be different instances when I would or wouldn't be in charge of a friend's child there, and I would consider age, circumstance, my experience with their behavior, etc. But using a different example than dogs, like maybe pools, I probably would watch my friend's kids at the Poly Volcano pool, but definitely not Stormalong Bay because I would fine it stressful. I might not watch the younger one because she's not always a great listener, etc. But I don't know what the situation will be like at POR in a few months with the new policy, and I'd like to think about these things now so I can talk with my friend before about our expectations with each other, instead of having an awkward conversation later. The only dogs we would have encountered before at the resort were service dogs, who are well trained. It could be different now depending upon how many people bring dogs and how rules are followed and enforced. For all I know, one of her kids could have an allergy or a phobia...
I did not take offense, just wanted to clarify as I felt they may have been taken out of context, plus I generally don't get offended by other's posts, like I said I try to worry about my own clarity and expression.