To go with a 1 yr old or not

[tinkerbesh]

Do you have to make a Adr for a one year old

Yes - every person needs to be accounted for in all ADRs. It's a fire code thing, not financial. You won't be charged for a plate for the 1 year old.

 

[owynn]

I included him on all our reservations for this upcoming trip, since we will need a table that has room for a high chair.

 

[Dionnemay]

Looking for some feedback on if a 1 year old should go to disney world. I am all about it, while my wife is totally against it. Maybe i am crazy, but i think it would be a blast and just so everyones aware it will not be our only trip, my wife and i agree we will go every 2 years. We just dont agree when we should start going. Any feedback is appreciated!

If you agree with me, any advice how to convince the spouse?

Thanks!

Personally, I wouldn't. But it all depends of how big of a "disnut" you are. If getting on a lot of rides isn't a big deal for you and you're ok with doing a lot of spectating - also VERY patient , and ok with returning to your hotel at least twice during the day and possibly missing out on fireworks, it could work. Also, your wife would have to be so laid back as well--either that or be OK with being a single rider.

The earliest age I would bring a child would be four. At that age they're able to walk on their own for a reasonable long period of time without having to be in the stroller or carried all the time. They're also a bit more tolerant of the heat and crowds and can follow most of the action going on around them whereas a smaller child can quickly become tired over stimulated, hot, and grouchy. I mean, just think about how HOT and exhausting a day at Disney is for an ADULT- imagine for a baby or toddler. My baby is almost 2 and she was worn out and irritable after 3 hours at the ZOO- how do you think shed be 12 hours in Disneyland?

I used to smh and get a little upset at parents I would see dragging their babies and toddlers under four through WDW or DL. I mean, on one hand they had my respect because I knew what a handful they were dealing with; naps, crying, grumpiness, frequent trips to the restroom, fighting to keep them out of the sun, carrying them, missing out on the "Adult rides" and being sequestered to fantasyland all day.

On the other hand, I didn't think it was fair to the kids. Most of them looked hot and miserable, were sleeping or getting bumped and jostled around in their strollers by fat tourists, and the babies didn't even know what was going on beyond their sippy cup. When you think about it, babies and little kids that young wont even remember the trip. The whole point of taking a child to Disney is for it to be a lifelong memory they can look back on fondly as part of their childhood and pass on to their own kids....also its a great card to throw when they turn into teenagers and start the emo "you dont care about me" phase.

Whats the point of spending hundreds or even thousands of dollars and going through all that drama and putting all that energy into a trip that most kids will NEVER experience and would KILL for, that isn't even going to be REMEMBERED a week or even an hour later?

Pssh. Not me. If Im gonna spend all that money, they damn well are gonna remember and appreciate it! Also, I like to ride on rides. I cant imagine spending the ENTIRE day in fantasy land and the pre-k areas. Thats why I say if you're gonna bring a baby, bring at least 2 other adults so 2 can go ride Space Mountain while one watches the baby, then switch off. Of course, doing it that way also makes your day LONGER because you're doing double the work. You could maybe bring the grandparents- they usually like a slower pace and aren't too interested in the big rides, and grandpa might be grumpy and ready to go back to the hotel and take a nap the same time Jr is.

First time I brought my kids, my son was 4 and my daughter was 7. We had a blast. I wasn't able to get on a lot of bigger rides I wanted but there were still enough (like Space Mountain, Matterhorn, BTMRR) that we could hit that we couldn't have if my son was a baby. Even then, I took them back many times after that but it was almost FOUR years before my son was tall enough where we could FINALLY ride Indiana Jones at Disneyland and Rockin Rollercoaster at WDW .

I think when parents bring babies that small its more for the PARENT than the actual child. Like some parents either feel "guilty" about leaving them, are super attached to their babies, or cant find a sitter.

But a 1 year old isn't gonna care one way or the other and would actually be more comfortable in the hotel room watching pepa pig and playing baby mega bloks in their diaper, which is a LOT cheaper.

 

[Jenna319]

Everyone is going to have a different opinion on this. It is really what works best for your family. You know your child and how they will tolerate being in a different atmosphere/schedule. My child is extremely flexible, happy 90% of the time and tolerates a change in schedule well. We took her on a long car ride from Chicago to Tennessee just last month and she did perfectly. We are taking her for her 1st birthday next month and I have absolutely no regrets. I'm not saying there won't be some meltdowns - I am sure there will be. But that can happen anywhere - might as well be in Disney!! There are many things a 1 year old can go on in Disney and they have baby care centers at every park as an added convenience.

The statement "they won't remember it" angers me - they won't remember plenty of things in those first few years but that is no reason not to still do it. Yes, this trip is most definitely for you, the parents. The 1st time your child breaks into a smile on Small World, the 1st picture walking down Main Street USA, the 1st interaction with Mickey Mouse - no your child won't remember it, but you will!!!! Capture those special moments with plenty of pictures and show your child the fun you all shared on your 1st Disney trip. We are taking along grandma so I am super appreciative for the help, as this will be our 1st Disney trip with a baby. We are also staying at the Grand Floridian so being on the monorail will make things easier too. I have been to Disney plenty of times and don't need to ride every ride. I am planning to just enjoy the little things that I never really cared to experience when I was childless - parades, meet & greets, and stopping to smell the roses.

That being said, if this is a Once in a Lifetime Trip, then I would possibly wait till they are older, but if you are like many of us and make Disney trips a priority every few years, I say go and enjoy!!

 

[Mousemommy1]

Personally, I wouldn't. But it all depends of how big of a "disnut" you are. If getting on a lot of rides isn't a big deal for you and you're ok with doing a lot of spectating - also VERY patient , and ok with returning to your hotel at least twice during the day and possibly missing out on fireworks, it could work. Also, your wife would have to be so laid back as well--either that or be OK with being a single rider.

The earliest age I would bring a child would be four. At that age they're able to walk on their own for a reasonable long period of time without having to be in the stroller or carried all the time. They're also a bit more tolerant of the heat and crowds and can follow most of the action going on around them whereas a smaller child can quickly become tired over stimulated, hot, and grouchy. I mean, just think about how HOT and exhausting a day at Disney is for an ADULT- imagine for a baby or toddler. My baby is almost 2 and she was worn out and irritable after 3 hours at the ZOO- how do you think shed be 12 hours in Disneyland?

I used to smh and get a little upset at parents I would see dragging their babies and toddlers under four through WDW or DL. I mean, on one hand they had my respect because I knew what a handful they were dealing with; naps, crying, grumpiness, frequent trips to the restroom, fighting to keep them out of the sun, carrying them, missing out on the "Adult rides" and being sequestered to fantasyland all day.

On the other hand, I didn't think it was fair to the kids. Most of them looked hot and miserable, were sleeping or getting bumped and jostled around in their strollers by fat tourists, and the babies didn't even know what was going on beyond their sippy cup. When you think about it, babies and little kids that young wont even remember the trip. The whole point of taking a child to Disney is for it to be a lifelong memory they can look back on fondly as part of their childhood and pass on to their own kids....also its a great card to throw when they turn into teenagers and start the emo "you dont care about me" phase.

Whats the point of spending hundreds or even thousands of dollars and going through all that drama and putting all that energy into a trip that most kids will NEVER experience and would KILL for, that isn't even going to be REMEMBERED a week or even an hour later?

Pssh. Not me. If Im gonna spend all that money, they damn well are gonna remember and appreciate it! Also, I like to ride on rides. I cant imagine spending the ENTIRE day in fantasy land and the pre-k areas. Thats why I say if you're gonna bring a baby, bring at least 2 other adults so 2 can go ride Space Mountain while one watches the baby, then switch off. Of course, doing it that way also makes your day LONGER because you're doing double the work. You could maybe bring the grandparents- they usually like a slower pace and aren't too interested in the big rides, and grandpa might be grumpy and ready to go back to the hotel and take a nap the same time Jr is.

First time I brought my kids, my son was 4 and my daughter was 7. We had a blast. I wasn't able to get on a lot of bigger rides I wanted but there were still enough (like Space Mountain, Matterhorn, BTMRR) that we could hit that we couldn't have if my son was a baby. Even then, I took them back many times after that but it was almost FOUR years before my son was tall enough where we could FINALLY ride Indiana Jones at Disneyland and Rockin Rollercoaster at WDW .

I think when parents bring babies that small its more for the PARENT than the actual child. Like some parents either feel "guilty" about leaving them, are super attached to their babies, or cant find a sitter.

But a 1 year old isn't gonna care one way or the other and would actually be more comfortable in the hotel room watching pepa pig and playing baby mega bloks in their diaper, which is a LOT cheaper.

With all due respect, we brought our 3 month old along because it's a family vacation. He is our child. We go every year and would never have dreamed of going without him. (We also have an 11 and 8 yr old).

Nope, he is never going to remember it. But, he enjoyed it while he was there...and I think my older kids melted down more than he did. He was the easiest person to deal with, lol. DH and I will remember the trip forever.

Next year, when we do Disney, we are also doing a Disney cruise. He will be 15 months old *gasp*. And we absolutely can't wait!

 

[2Pirates2Princesses]

Personally, I wouldn't. But it all depends of how big of a "disnut" you are. If getting on a lot of rides isn't a big deal for you and you're ok with doing a lot of spectating - also VERY patient , and ok with returning to your hotel at least twice during the day and possibly missing out on fireworks, it could work. Also, your wife would have to be so laid back as well--either that or be OK with being a single rider.

The earliest age I would bring a child would be four. At that age they're able to walk on their own for a reasonable long period of time without having to be in the stroller or carried all the time. They're also a bit more tolerant of the heat and crowds and can follow most of the action going on around them whereas a smaller child can quickly become tired over stimulated, hot, and grouchy. I mean, just think about how HOT and exhausting a day at Disney is for an ADULT- imagine for a baby or toddler. My baby is almost 2 and she was worn out and irritable after 3 hours at the ZOO- how do you think shed be 12 hours in Disneyland?

I used to smh and get a little upset at parents I would see dragging their babies and toddlers under four through WDW or DL. I mean, on one hand they had my respect because I knew what a handful they were dealing with; naps, crying, grumpiness, frequent trips to the restroom, fighting to keep them out of the sun, carrying them, missing out on the "Adult rides" and being sequestered to fantasyland all day.

On the other hand, I didn't think it was fair to the kids. Most of them looked hot and miserable, were sleeping or getting bumped and jostled around in their strollers by fat tourists, and the babies didn't even know what was going on beyond their sippy cup. When you think about it, babies and little kids that young wont even remember the trip. The whole point of taking a child to Disney is for it to be a lifelong memory they can look back on fondly as part of their childhood and pass on to their own kids....also its a great card to throw when they turn into teenagers and start the emo "you dont care about me" phase.

Whats the point of spending hundreds or even thousands of dollars and going through all that drama and putting all that energy into a trip that most kids will NEVER experience and would KILL for, that isn't even going to be REMEMBERED a week or even an hour later?

Pssh. Not me. If Im gonna spend all that money, they damn well are gonna remember and appreciate it! Also, I like to ride on rides. I cant imagine spending the ENTIRE day in fantasy land and the pre-k areas. Thats why I say if you're gonna bring a baby, bring at least 2 other adults so 2 can go ride Space Mountain while one watches the baby, then switch off. Of course, doing it that way also makes your day LONGER because you're doing double the work. You could maybe bring the grandparents- they usually like a slower pace and aren't too interested in the big rides, and grandpa might be grumpy and ready to go back to the hotel and take a nap the same time Jr is.

First time I brought my kids, my son was 4 and my daughter was 7. We had a blast. I wasn't able to get on a lot of bigger rides I wanted but there were still enough (like Space Mountain, Matterhorn, BTMRR) that we could hit that we couldn't have if my son was a baby. Even then, I took them back many times after that but it was almost FOUR years before my son was tall enough where we could FINALLY ride Indiana Jones at Disneyland and Rockin Rollercoaster at WDW .

I think when parents bring babies that small its more for the PARENT than the actual child. Like some parents either feel "guilty" about leaving them, are super attached to their babies, or cant find a sitter.

But a 1 year old isn't gonna care one way or the other and would actually be more comfortable in the hotel room watching pepa pig and playing baby mega bloks in their diaper, which is a LOT cheaper.

I understand your viewpoint, but having been to WDW with a toddler and going back next year with another toddler, I would rather take a baby to WDW than any other vacation destination because it is such a family/child friendly atmosphere and very accommodating to families with little ones which is why there are so many families with little ones at Disney. I am with the pp that stated that WDW is a family vacation and there is something for everyone and it isn't always feasible to wait until everyone is at the *perfect* age (if there is one) to go; especially if you have kids that are spread out in age. Yes it's a pricey trip, and if the price is the biggest issue then I'd definitely hold out until I was at the point where I wouldn't ponder any regrets; but life is too short and childhood is so fleeting so if DH and I were to approach investing in family experiences this way then we probably would have never got our family to WDW . Lastly, waiting until your kiddos are tall enough for the handful of rides with a height requirement wouldn't be a reason I would put off a Disney trip. 40 inches does seem to be that magic number for the few headliners with height requirements, but they still may not want to ride the ride even if they are tall enough. My 13 year old DD is 5"7 and taller than me and you can't pay her to go near Space Mountain, Rockin' Rollercoaster, or TOT

 

[Mousemommy1]

I understand your viewpoint, but having been to WDW with a toddler and going back next year with another toddler, I would rather take a baby to WDW than any other vacation destination because it is such a family/child friendly atmosphere and very accommodating to families with little ones which is why there are so many families with little ones at Disney. I am with the pp that stated that WDW is a family vacation and there is something for everyone and it isn't always feasible to wait until everyone is at the *perfect* age (if there is one) to go; especially if you have kids that are spread out in age. Yes it's a pricey trip, and if the price is the biggest issue then I'd definitely hold out until I was at the point where I wouldn't ponder any regrets; but life is too short and childhood is so fleeting so if DH and I were to approach investing in family experiences this way then we probably would have never got our family to WDW . Lastly, waiting until your kiddos are tall enough for the handful of rides with a height requirement wouldn't be a reason I would put off a Disney trip. 40 inches does seem to be that magic number for the few headliners with height requirements, but they still may not want to ride the ride even if they are tall enough. My 13 year old DD is 5"7 and taller than me and you can't pay her to go near Space Mountain, Rockin' Rollercoaster, or TOT

OT - but I am totally envious of your big family!!! Looks like a great crew!!

We wanted four, but after our 2nd we were diagnosed with unexplained infertility but ended up with a surprise pregnancy last year and our son is now 8 months old.

We love our family of five but geez, you guys must have so much fun!!!

 

[mcjaco]

Took my sons when they were fifteen months. Wouldn't have done it any other way.

 

[Jake&IzzyLand]

I think it all depends on your kid. I have a two year old that detests riding in her buggy and always has. I get a half hour tops, so I know for her I need to wait. My older DD was the complete opposite and quite content just to chill and take in the sights and sounds. My younger DD has just always been an independent explorer. We still travel, but it's to low key places where she has more freedom and is not confined to her buggy. As she gets older she is getting easier to reason with and is starting to understand first we do this then we'll do that type of thing.

 

[2Pirates2Princesses]

OT - but I am totally envious of your big family!!! Looks like a great crew!!

We wanted four, but after our 2nd we were diagnosed with unexplained infertility but ended up with a surprise pregnancy last year and our son is now 8 months old.

We love our family of five but geez, you guys must have so much fun!!!

Yes, we bring the party to where ever we go, lol! Our youngest DD was also our surprise blessing, but I am sure you feel the same way I do in that it feels like the surprise one was always meant to be here .

 

[jodifla]

Personally, I wouldn't. But it all depends of how big of a "disnut" you are. If getting on a lot of rides isn't a big deal for you and you're ok with doing a lot of spectating - also VERY patient , and ok with returning to your hotel at least twice during the day and possibly missing out on fireworks, it could work. Also, your wife would have to be so laid back as well--either that or be OK with being a single rider.

The earliest age I would bring a child would be four. At that age they're able to walk on their own for a reasonable long period of time without having to be in the stroller or carried all the time. They're also a bit more tolerant of the heat and crowds and can follow most of the action going on around them whereas a smaller child can quickly become tired over stimulated, hot, and grouchy. I mean, just think about how HOT and exhausting a day at Disney is for an ADULT- imagine for a baby or toddler. My baby is almost 2 and she was worn out and irritable after 3 hours at the ZOO- how do you think shed be 12 hours in Disneyland?

I used to smh and get a little upset at parents I would see dragging their babies and toddlers under four through WDW or DL. I mean, on one hand they had my respect because I knew what a handful they were dealing with; naps, crying, grumpiness, frequent trips to the restroom, fighting to keep them out of the sun, carrying them, missing out on the "Adult rides" and being sequestered to fantasyland all day.

On the other hand, I didn't think it was fair to the kids. Most of them looked hot and miserable, were sleeping or getting bumped and jostled around in their strollers by fat tourists, and the babies didn't even know what was going on beyond their sippy cup. When you think about it, babies and little kids that young wont even remember the trip. The whole point of taking a child to Disney is for it to be a lifelong memory they can look back on fondly as part of their childhood and pass on to their own kids....also its a great card to throw when they turn into teenagers and start the emo "you dont care about me" phase.

Whats the point of spending hundreds or even thousands of dollars and going through all that drama and putting all that energy into a trip that most kids will NEVER experience and would KILL for, that isn't even going to be REMEMBERED a week or even an hour later?

Pssh. Not me. If Im gonna spend all that money, they damn well are gonna remember and appreciate it! Also, I like to ride on rides. I cant imagine spending the ENTIRE day in fantasy land and the pre-k areas. Thats why I say if you're gonna bring a baby, bring at least 2 other adults so 2 can go ride Space Mountain while one watches the baby, then switch off. Of course, doing it that way also makes your day LONGER because you're doing double the work. You could maybe bring the grandparents- they usually like a slower pace and aren't too interested in the big rides, and grandpa might be grumpy and ready to go back to the hotel and take a nap the same time Jr is.

First time I brought my kids, my son was 4 and my daughter was 7. We had a blast. I wasn't able to get on a lot of bigger rides I wanted but there were still enough (like Space Mountain, Matterhorn, BTMRR) that we could hit that we couldn't have if my son was a baby. Even then, I took them back many times after that but it was almost FOUR years before my son was tall enough where we could FINALLY ride Indiana Jones at Disneyland and Rockin Rollercoaster at WDW .

I think when parents bring babies that small its more for the PARENT than the actual child. Like some parents either feel "guilty" about leaving them, are super attached to their babies, or cant find a sitter.

But a 1 year old isn't gonna care one way or the other and would actually be more comfortable in the hotel room watching pepa pig and playing baby mega bloks in their diaper, which is a LOT cheaper.

Sorry, I think you are wrong on so many counts. Babies should be out in the world, seeing and enjoying, not just stuffed in a hotel room. You totally underestimate how babies connect with their surroundings. Disney is perfect for all ages.

We started taking our child at 5 months old. He loved it! So much to see, and enjoy. We all laughed and had so much fun. My joy was watching him seeing all the sights. Diapers, no biggie. Just changed them and went on with our day. Didn't go back to the room for naps very often, instead he just napped in the stroller. He could go on almost every ride even at 5 months. For the coasters, we just did rider swap.

You are making it out to be a much bigger pain that it is.

 

[Mousemommy1]

Yes, we bring the party to where ever we go, lol! Our youngest DD was also our surprise blessing, but I am sure you feel the same way I do in that it feels like the surprise one was always meant to be here .

Yes!! We can't imagine our lives without him!! It's just the way it's supposed to be.

Congrats on your wonderful family!

 

[party-of-five]

Personally, I would never do it. My DS is soon to be 8 and we are taking him for the first time. Now, if the trip would be solely for you and not for the child at all, then maybe...depending on how tolerant you are. Personally I think 1 would be the WORST age to take a child. Child will likely be afraid of EVERYTHING (rides and characters both), will be miserable in the heat, won't want to stay put in a stroller, will be cranky if regular sleep/nap schedule is off which it would likely be. If you and DW want to ride any rides that child can't, you would have to do ride swap and not ride together. Just out of curiosity, how are you picturing the trip? How would it be fun?

And you're basing this on what experience? We've taken our two youngest sons at age 1 and they were fantastic vacations! We went in Nov/Dec so it wasn't too hot. They didn't spend all day in strollers but rather toddled down main st and thru the countries of Epcot at their own pace smiling and enjoying the different sites and sounds - exploring like little ones should. When they were tired, we rested. We didn't have a single meltdown! Do they remember the trip - no, of course not. But we do and share the stories with them now - they enjoy hearing them. They enjoy seeing the pictures. Family vacations are about sharing time as a family. So, if we took your advice and waited until they were 8 to take a vacation to Disney we would still be waiting to go. That makes me sad to think of all of the wonderful memories we would have missed out on.

Oh... And BTW, 8 year olds get hot, and tired, and cranky too... So be ready.

Op, you asked for experiences - we have taken 1 year olds and we would do it again in a heartbeat. Be ready to go at baby's pace, be ready to take breaks, know that you won't see and do it all, and you'll be fine. It's all about expectations. As far as convincing your spouse - ugh... Just keep talking about it. Ask her what her concerns are and try to come up with solutions. Maybe compromise and set an age that you can both be happy with?

 

[Mousemommy1]

And you're basing this on what experience? We've taken our two youngest sons at age 1 and they were fantastic vacations! We went in Nov/Dec so it wasn't too hot. They didn't spend all day in strollers but rather toddled down main st and thru the countries of Epcot at their own pace smiling and enjoying the different sites and sounds - exploring like little ones should. When they were tired, we rested. We didn't have a single meltdown! Do they remember the trip - no, of course not. But we do and share the stories with them now - they enjoy hearing them. They enjoy seeing the pictures. Family vacations are about sharing time as a family. So, if we took your advice and waited until they were 8 to take a vacation to Disney we would still be waiting to go. That makes me sad to think of all of the wonderful memories we would have missed out on.

Oh... And BTW, 8 year olds get hot, and tired, and cranky too... So be ready.

Op, you asked for experiences - we have taken 1 year olds and we would do it again in a heartbeat. Be ready to go at baby's pace, be ready to take breaks, know that you won't see and do it all, and you'll be fine. It's all about expectations. As far as convincing your spouse - ugh... Just keep talking about it. Ask her what her concerns are and try to come up with solutions. Maybe compromise and set an age that you can both be happy with?

Even adults get hot and cranky....I was 20 weeks pregnant on our trip last August....I was a bear to deal with. I bet my family wondered why they hadn't left me behind.

 

[party-of-five]

Even adults get hot and cranky....I was 20 weeks pregnant on our trip last August....I was a bear to deal with. I bet my family wondered why they hadn't left me behind.

Wow... 20 weeks along - in August. I would have had many meltdowns. Im worried about the heat for our upcoming Sept trip - and our only park day is for MNSSHP. For me it's hunger - my husband laughs (but I think he's secretly grateful) but I've made a list of restaurants and addresses so I'll be prepared.

 

[kmdrago1783]

Personally, I would never do it. My DS is soon to be 8 and we are taking him for the first time. Now, if the trip would be solely for you and not for the child at all, then maybe...depending on how tolerant you are. Personally I think 1 would be the WORST age to take a child. Child will likely be afraid of EVERYTHING (rides and characters both), will be miserable in the heat, won't want to stay put in a stroller, will be cranky if regular sleep/nap schedule is off which it would likely be. If you and DW want to ride any rides that child can't, you would have to do ride swap and not ride together. Just out of curiosity, how are you picturing the trip? How would it be fun?

Soooo, since your child is 8 and you are now taking him to WDW for the first time have you not vacationed as a family in 8 years because your child was too young?

1. We are only born with two fears-- fear of loud noises and fear of falling. Everything else is learned. At one my first DD loved rides and characters.
2. I hate to tell you this, but by waiting so long to take him you've missed out. At 8 some of the innocence that makes WDW so special for young kids is gone. He'll have fun sure, but won't look at the characters and all of the magic in the same way that a young child would. I've seen it firsthand myself.

Life doesn't end when you have a baby. I have always made sure that I don't stick to too rigid of a schedule in general with my kids. They learn to adapt to OUR schedule (within reason).

Our trip with our 4 year old and 11 month old DDS is in a month and a half and I can't wait!

 

[DisneyWishes14]

We took DS7 on his first WDW trip 2 weeks after his first birthday. We had a BLAST! Yes, it was a much more low-key trip than it would have been if it were just me and DH, but it was perfect for us. We have so many amazing memories of that trip. My DS was just starting to pull up and walk around holding on to things at the time and we have pictures of him doing this all over WDW - he LOVED it! Loved the characters, the rides, strolling around, going to the pool, etc.

And, quite frankly, mommy needed a vacation at the time and WDW was really our best choice with such a young child. My DS would nap in his stroller and we went during F&W and I'll never forget simply strolling around WS while he napped, sampling the food, shopping, sitting and relaxing. After a year of utter sleep deprivation, it was a welcome change of pace and environment for everyone.

 

[little miss minnie]

Took my daughter at 9 months, taking her again at 20 months (in 2 weeks!!!) I absolutely love having her there. It makes it even more magical. Will she remember...no... But will my husband and I remember....yes. As long as you are flexible, patient and prepared.... a trip to DW with a young child is just as enjoyable as it is without children, but in a completely different way,

 

[Grace W]

Looking for some feedback on if a 1 year old should go to disney world. I am all about it, while my wife is totally against it. Maybe i am crazy, but i think it would be a blast and just so everyones aware it will not be our only trip, my wife and i agree we will go every 2 years. We just dont agree when we should start going. Any feedback is appreciated!

If you agree with me, any advice how to convince the spouse?

Thanks!

We took our 1 year old last year and it was a blast. Not to mention a very easy trip. She slept in the stroller. It was very enjoyable to see the excitement in her face. We got to do everything we wanted because she just went along with everything we had planned. This year, she will be 2 and im sure it will be a different story. Either way, nothing beats seeing their faces at disney!

 

[Raenstoirm]

Do you have to make a Adr for a one year old

We had to make them for our 3 month old infants

Even adults get hot and cranky....I was 20 weeks pregnant on our trip last August....I was a bear to deal with. I bet my family wondered why they hadn't left me behind.

I was 17 weeks with twins in early September so I feel ya! Great trip though.

Just dh and I brought our 13 WEEK old twins in June. It was a great trip. We stayed for 6 days. We stayed out till after midnight every day and went bak to the room for one nap. We travel a lot. My twins had visited 6 states before their 6 month birthday. They turn 7 months in 1.5 weeks and I was telling my husband we have to come up with a new state in the next week! lol. Im thinking disneyland. (we are on the east coast). He is not amused. lol
We are heading back to WDW when they are 10 months old. Then a disney cruise just after their first birthdays and maybe disneyland paris if the finances work out next spring.