WoodysRoundup
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2004
- Messages
- 1,143
This is an example of the extreme other side of the equation thats why the whole situation is screwed up from top to bottom across the country, you have those who dont pay and you have those that just think its an automatic charge no matter what happens as far as the service goes
Its SUPPOSED to be to reward/thank people who actually gave a service to you. Its supposed to be based on the level of service you get, not simply for the job itself.
I think it stinks that their wages are so low, but I also think it stinks that you get pretty basic service nowadays due to the fact that alot of people just lay out the flat rate tip no matter what the level of service is(or dont lay it out at all no matter what the level is)
both sides have caused this issue-because now for the most part you get this standard across the table service. It doesnt pay to be good, and it doesnt not pay to be bad
I don't agree that my thinking is on the "extreme other side of the equation". Maybe we're just used to getting good service when we go out (which we do). Or maybe, we're not looking to overly critique service when we dine out. Either way, you tip when you dine out. That's just the way it is. If service is poor, you let management know. That's why they are there. Funny this topic is being discussed now. Just last night 3 friends and myself were out to dinner. We split the check evenly. When discussing what tip to leave the server, all 4 of us agreed 20% was a baseline. (We ended up leaving more for great service). Point is, all 4 agreed that 20% is always the baseline tip. We also live in a major metropolitan area. I'm sure that all 4 would also agree in letting management know if service was subpar.