@Mumof4mice ...I just read this on the resale restriction thread. Went through several pages of the thread, but not the legal bible that is the Public Offering Statement, in search of the reasoning behind your statement. Can you give me and other interested members the Cliff's Notes version?
Hi
@emchen ,
The membership saw a whirlwind of changes in 2018, beginning with the MF increase, attempted (and retracted)
point chart reallocations, culminating in the announcement of the Riviera resale restrictions. Truth be told, I didn't care enough to take action until a friend told me they were selling out of irritation.
@crvetter ,
@ziravan ,
@Bing Showei and many other members read into the POS in more detail and will be able to answer specific questions far better than I can.
When the Riviera resale restrictions were announced, I thought it might have been the first step toward creation of "
DVC 2", a new group of resorts that would trade amongst themselves. I could see the benefits (for Disney) in the segregation of future builds from the existing DVC resorts. Creating a new club with it's own trading company = clean slate to structure POS,
point charts, and "perks" for future resorts any way they like. It could even encourage existing owners to add points at DVC2 resorts.
Surely Disney was restricting Riviera resale owners from the L14, not all future resorts? I couldn't see the logic for Disney to implement a change so devastating to all Riviera purchasers, should they need to sell, and so damaging to public relations, for a short term boost to their bottom line. But the POS revision document I obtained stated otherwise. Riviera resale owners were indeed restricted to home resort only. Further, direct buyers were free to trade into all resorts, while post-1.19 resale buyers of L14 could not trade into future resorts.
I don't have an issue with not being able to trade into future DVC resorts. No owner, direct or resale, was guaranteed that. The POS explicitly states that DVD does not guarantee any future resort would be built, or that we would be able to access them. In fact, existing amenities are not guaranteed to continue to exist - what would VGF be worth without GF, the monorail and Magic Kingdom? We bought accepting the risk of complete disaster, trusting Disney's self interest of staying in business would keep the theme parks and hotels running.
However, if Disney wanted to tap into existing resorts to sell Riviera and Reflections instead of waiting for DVC 2's own halo resort, I expect the trading terms to be equitable. If post 1.19 resale owners from my home resorts aren't allowed to trade out (our resales were grandfathered), allowing new direct purchasers to trade in is an unequal situation, IMO. I'm still surprised and unimpressed Disney made that business decision.
Having said that, we don't let our annoyance with DVC management affect our enjoyment of the parks and DVC resorts. Our opinion is DVC should be viewed in the same category as vacations and cars; only bought with entertainment budget that would have 100% disappeared. When one takes that position, expectations and therefore disappointment are low.