crazyforgoofy
Finally - Isabella's forever Mom! 9/08/05
- Joined
- May 11, 2002
- Messages
- 6,273
I'm enjoying the 'McCain is way up in the polls' cackling their doing. It's March. 


I'm enjoying the 'McCain is way up in the polls' cackling their doing. It's March.![]()

Turns out the person that accessed both the McCain file & Obama file on March 14th is a State Department EMPLOYEE, not a contractor...
Divide and conquer eh?Interesting. I wonder why just those two and not Clinton's.

Interesting. I wonder why just those two and not Clinton's.
Interesting. I wonder why just those two and not Clinton's.
"The United States of America values everyone's privacy and corrective action should be taken," McCain said.

"You see the Jonestown reference isn't lost on me. The only difference here is that the Bush supporters are drinking the kool-aid but they're not the ones who are dying. "
That is perfect!

Whoa~ The gang at Fox News (usually know at Fixed News) is having a dust-up over the 'typical' story. Looks like Chris Wallace has decided to step away from the usual lock step message. Watch here and find out lots more:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/21/foxs-chris-wallace-criti_n_92741.html
Gosh, I wonder if someone ought to post it on Dawn's 'typical' thread.![]()

Got caught before he got to her?
I don't know, so far it seems like this could be much ado about nothing much, but it certainly needs looking into, especially why it took so long for Obama to be notified, if the 1st breech happened in January, if the employee's had political motivations, and if they passed on info to others.
This quote made me roll my eyes...
Right. That's why we need warrantless wiretapping...

Whoa~ The gang at Fox News (usually know at Fixed News) is having a dust-up over the 'typical' story. Looks like Chris Wallace has decided to step away from the usual lock step message. Watch here and find out lots more:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/21/foxs-chris-wallace-criti_n_92741.html
Gosh, I wonder if someone ought to post it on Dawn's 'typical' thread.![]()
