Hi BostonTigger
I'm sorry you felt we were having a war of words - I didn't mean to come across like that
It sounded to me like you were criticizing Alex (and he was taking some heat from other people too) for making the DB decision and I was just trying to make it clear that it wasn't just him and that he shouldn't be the sole focus of people's 'discontent'. It sounds like, from your later post, you may have been confusing him with Pete? (Who really can do anything he likes with these boards as they belong to him and is therefore 'his world').
Anyhow, I should really be thanking you now that you've brought to light Alex's nefarious plans for a hostile takeover - don't think you are fooling me with that innocent look Alex...
Hi RM, yes I am aware of your feelings on the matter as you've made them known several times since your own signature got busted. All I can say is - we are only human. There are no automated ways of checking people's signatures so it's just where the Tech Team spot them on their travels or when it's reported by another user. It's not a perfect system but it's the best we've got I'm afraid.
Dsny fn - after your suggestion to us to change the whole site just in order to accommodate what are currently illegal signatures which you personally don't have a problem with, well I can only say that you obviously <i>did</i> miss my whole point.
I'm sorry you felt we were having a war of words - I didn't mean to come across like that

It sounded to me like you were criticizing Alex (and he was taking some heat from other people too) for making the DB decision and I was just trying to make it clear that it wasn't just him and that he shouldn't be the sole focus of people's 'discontent'. It sounds like, from your later post, you may have been confusing him with Pete? (Who really can do anything he likes with these boards as they belong to him and is therefore 'his world').
Anyhow, I should really be thanking you now that you've brought to light Alex's nefarious plans for a hostile takeover - don't think you are fooling me with that innocent look Alex...
Hi RM, yes I am aware of your feelings on the matter as you've made them known several times since your own signature got busted. All I can say is - we are only human. There are no automated ways of checking people's signatures so it's just where the Tech Team spot them on their travels or when it's reported by another user. It's not a perfect system but it's the best we've got I'm afraid.
Dsny fn - after your suggestion to us to change the whole site just in order to accommodate what are currently illegal signatures which you personally don't have a problem with, well I can only say that you obviously <i>did</i> miss my whole point.

This site provides information about much of it. Additional boards formed (someone "in the know" correct me if I'm wrong) so that "offsite" discussions wouldn't get lost in "onsite" discussions, etc, and vice versa. It was my understanding (gosh...don't feel like taking the time to do further research) that there were also sites for Universal and Seaworld, owned by Pete. Whether they now are all technically included as part of the same site, or contain links to each other, are on the same server or whatever, is nitpicking the issue. Would you have been happier if Pete had said "This is an Orlando destination Board"?
I think not.
, but then again, I did miss the manure thread!
? I did nothing to you, I just stated an opinion.
. We tried not to interfere until a thread was reported because after all, it was a debate board and debates often get alittle heated. And now many are complaining we didn't interfere enough?????