Aurora0427
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2014
- Messages
- 4,586
So is Mike Hamilton a custodian at the GF or the Polynesian? Which is it?
I don't think anyone is saying they shouldn't have bought the land. Every year, week, day, things change. Nature changes, the property changes, people in charge change, etc. With those changes certain precautions should have been implemented. Especially after the other attack in the 80s. Once that attack occurred the threat of alligators atleast warranted a sign and fencing.
No gator signs after someone was attacked in the 80's? Just saying......
As the article said; In 1986, an alligator bit a boy at a pond at Disney's Fort Wilderness campground. The boy suffered knee and thigh injuries. The parents later sued the resort, alleging Disney failed to warn visitors."
That being said, after even one incident like the one that happened in the 80's I believe it was negligent on Disney's part not to include SPECIFIC sign warnings - No Swimming no way implies - watch out as your child could get bit by an alligator at the water's edge!!! No swimming also does not imply you can't walk in the water. I predict a multi-million dollar lawsuit in the making - not that all the money in the world could comfort that poor family - their pain and loss will never end. Negligence - yes especially considering how nearby non-Disney hotels had specific sign warnings for alligators & snakes. Sorry, you can't expect out of state or out of country guests to know about these types of dangers.
I expect people to be responsible for themselves at all times...no matter what there surroundings are.
Especially with the wealth of information available in a millisecond via touchscreen
Do you research whether or not the rides at Disney are safe, or their buses, or monorail, or their ferries, or any other offering they have? I bet most people do not because there is an assumption of safety in services offered. By making a beach, having boat shows on the water, putting chairs and hammocks on the beach, selling buckets, placing playground on beaches, they have made their beaches an attraction. Yet they never warn you of the potential danger. Yes, it is very rare, but that won't comfort that family and I certainly don't want my child to be one of the rare instances of a tragedy.
At first I really thought it was a tragic accident and no one is to blame, but the more I read, the more I think Disney is at fault. It would not have been difficult to put up a sign warning you or telling you when you check in that the waterways have alligators and its illegal to feed them.
And possibly a judge and jury. But you're right anything we say here is personal opinion.We can go back and forth but in the end it doesn't really matter what we think, only what Disney, their legal team, insurance company, and the poor family of the little boy and their legal team thinks.
Bill
See...to me...that sounds a lot like an acknowledgement that they catch/kill/move around so many that's it's a constant thing (it is)...and that in typical Disney style there are no radio calls, no reports, no real identification of what is being done by a public agency...
And why? Because till this week it would have been considered "bad show"...and all that stuff was designed to go on "back stage"...
Inside Edition ran this video. Article attached. <snip!>
I'm sorry, when you have gators inches from your rides, you have a major problem on your hands.
I should think that this CM would have promptly reported the gator's presence that near a ride or maintained his efforts to keep the gator from coming any closer while alerting another CM to "Stop the damn ride and get the wildlife management people here NOW!!!" Closing the ride immediately due to "technical difficulties" would be standard procedure, I'm certain, until wildlife personnel could get there and deal with the gator.
Those bungalows shouldn't exist for a number of reasons...
Add this one to the list...the most dangerous one.
Well they don't sell all that well.But they want them. Great money maker. Can we say GREED!
I think a significant factor in this terrible death was that the family is from Nebraska where lakes do not include lethal animals able to snatch a toddler at water's edge.
I grew up in Northwest Kansas just 15 miles below the Nebraska line. My family often went to lakes in both states. The most worrisome things along the edge of lakes in that part of the country would be sharp rocks, broken glass or junk metal that might cut your bare foot.
At those lakes, swimming outside designated areas means no lifeguard and a risk of drowning if you step off an unanticipated dropoff. That's about it. Fear of a child's playing and wading at water's edge while supervised by a parent is unheard of.
People can argue until the Nebraska cows come home that "EVERYbody knows there are alligators in Florida." However, knowing that there are doesn't necessarily mean that a non-resident family fully comprehends the danger.
I can easily understand this family's thinking it safe for their child to wade in water so near a Disney resort. "No swimming" to them, as it would to me, probably meant don't swim because there's no specific swimming area with a lifeguard. That wading could be life threatening likely never even occurred to them.
No water moccasins in Kansas?
Rattlers or copperheads?
Maybe you are just used to those so you don't think about them. After all, how often does someone get hurt by one--- every 25 years or so?