stemikger said:
I'm going to say something I never said to anyone on these boards and I might even get called on it, but. . .
YOU SOUND LIKE A COMPLETE IDIOT.
Children in Italy have been drinking wine at dinner since the age of 7. Millions of kids drink their grandfathers wine and very few have become adults with drinking problems. Comparing a little sip at 16 is not the same as smoking and snorting cocaine. You have displayed a very ignorant few here and I should not be responding to such a foolish statement, but you just got my goat.
I hope you reconsider your opinion, and apologize for such a stupid reply to this post.
Millions in Africa are STILL sold as slaves. Does that make it OK?
Millions in America smoke pot on a regular basis - some with their parents. Does that make it OK?
Now, I'm not comparing alchohol to slavery, rather I'm trying to illustrate the point that just because something is OK is another part of the world, doesn't necessarily make it right. So, your argument is moot.
I am saying is that Alchohol is:
(1) illegal for minors to consume (with very few exceptions) in the US. So, if you allow your minor children to drink, not only are you teaching them disrespect for the law, you're encouraging it.
(2) addictive. If you've ever known any recovering alchoholics, they would tell you it is a very dangerous drug. Sneaks up on you. It can also be a stepping stone to other drugs.
There's a reason that lawmakers have decided that you must be of a certain age to drink. You need to have a certain maturity level to understand the limits and the consequences of drinking. From what I've seen on many of college campuses, 21 isn't old enough. Yes, there are very mature, responsible people at 16. There are also completely irresponsible people at 36. Overall, though there is an abundance of abuse of alchohol because people think alchohol is harmless and don't respect what it can do.
So, flame me if you will. Call me names - go ahead. I can take it. It reminds me of an old Chinese proverb that goes something like this... "He who strikes first admits that his ideas have run out."
I will NOT apologize for caring about the health and welfare of people and hoping that parents don't encourage their children to break the law or partake in activities that could evolve into something serious and life altering.
I will however, should you offer it, accept your apology for the name calling. I understand that in a heated discussion, it is very easy to let your emotions run amok. Happens to me all the time. I may not agree with your position, but I feel we can debate our differences in a mature fashion.