The variances have started to show up. We cannot make the mistake of thinking that the way it's done in OUR state, in our district even, is THE way it's done.
My children missed school for 5 days for Disney trip along with missing a few days for a death in the family and sickness throughout the whole school year and the next thing I know is I get a phone call from the police saying there are considered truant. I regret taking them to Disney now with all the trouble that it has caused. I thought because they are in the first grade five days would not make a big difference but I guess the teachers and the principal thought differently.I also had to sit down and explain why they missed the days they missed and now the teachers are holding them back in the first grade as a result.
(I'm assuming this was Texas, from everything I've read about TX school stuff)
They will be in 8th and 11th grades next year. They both chose the Panama Canal cruise for our next trip which means missing 11 days of school. ...
We did speak with our principal before booking the trip. He encouraged us to go, assured us the teachers would work with our kids on making up the missed work, and felt that the educational opportunities on our trip would far outweigh any missed time in the classroom.
11 days of school, the principal encouraged them to go.
The city policy is 10 consecutive missed days before there's any investigation/action, so I'm not worried about that, but hopefully her teacher is nice about it.
10 *consecutive* days. Not just 10 days!
Apparently in NJ 10 or more unexcused absences will get us reported to the court system....
10 UNexcused! Not 10 period.
So many variations!
As for missing days before standardized tests - if a child has to study for a standardized test, there is a bigger problem than missed school.
the 5th grade math is even harder when you try to teach them to do it backwards(common core)
Common Core is a set of standards, AND it seems to be a curriculum developed AFTER the standards were set up, but the curriculum itself is not necessary for the standards. Looks like the name of the math is Eureka Math, from commoncore.org, which is not the standards site.
The standards site is corestandards.org.
What is the Common Core?
State education chiefs and governors in 48 states came together to develop the Common Core, a set of clear college- and career-ready standards for kindergarten through 12th grade in English language arts/literacy and mathematics. Today, 44 states have voluntarily adopted and are working to implement the standards, which are designed to ensure that students graduating from high school are prepared to take credit bearing introductory courses in two- or four-year college programs or enter the workforce.
Do the standards tell teachers what to teach?
Teachers know best about what works in the classroom. That is why these standards establish what students need to learn, but do not dictate how teachers should teach. Instead, schools and teachers decide how best to help students reach the standards.
In the later 70s my mom couldn't help me with my math because it was "the new math". Apparently it was different than how she learned it in the 50s. My aunt, just 2 years ahead, says that the way I was taught is just like how she was taught. Alas my mom is long gone so I can't ask her WHY.
When I first saw the agenda-filled "common core is stupid" memes, it was complicated to figure out (the one where the kid is supposed to figure out where the kid in the problem went wrong, and the dad wrote all over it and had a tantrum about how you just subtract it), but about 10 minutes into it I figured out what he had written and what was shown on the fresh page, and there it was, easy peasy. NOT how I was taught, not really how I think, but I worked it out. I'm currently trying to work out that way, trying to work out teaching my son Singapore (because it's how he thinks), and still doing math my OWN way. Singapore and the stuff shown in that meme aren't the way I think, but I've expanded my learning to figure it out. And it's all just adding. So I'm showing DS how to do it all. He might choose to go to school-school, and I want him to be able to show the work they want him to show, no matter HOW he does it (which is generally just in his head so far).
4) Our teachers (public and parochial) admitted it wasn't that time-consuming, as they already had their lesson plans.
That's what I've always wondered when I read of teachers having a problem with it. Don't they have them prepared already? If not, why not? Unless your curriculum changes every single year, why don't you just have it all prepared?
I'm also curious about the concept of not knowing how to do the work if you haven't had the lesson. Shouldn't the textbook HAVE the lesson? If it doesn't, doesn't that mean it's a pretty rotten textbook? I was in grad school before the textbooks couldn't be relied upon (or we didn't even have a textbook and it was soley lecture-based), with the exception of a Linear Algebra book and an Organic Chemistry book later in college. (and sadly both involved horrible professors, one of whom was tenured and didn't care and had extra credit questions about the Beatles, and the other one was a creep who had such a curve that my 50% tests were a B-, and he just wanted women to come to this office for extra tutoring)
I'm now using Singapore for math with DS, and I bought the teacher manual for this set of books, and it's USELESS. I won't be buying the teacher manual going forward. I read through the lesson in the Textbook, go through it with DS, then he does the Workbook. The teacher manual is just to tell you "do this page of the textbook and this page of the workbook together" and also has extra things to do if the kids aren't getting it.
Wow that was long.
I'm sorry to take this thread down a different lane.. but I really am bugged about this statement.... and feel the need to address this way of thinking, concerning children with learning disabilities. (I am strictly speaking of learning disabilities, not physical disabilities.)
I don't think the sentence was meant in a mean way, but in a recognition that if a child already has extra challenges, taking them out of the learning environment might not be best for them. I think it was an acknowledgment, not a put-down.
[