the schools i went to never awarded for perfect attendance-and there was no such thing as honor roll till 7th grade. even then there were no certificates or 'perks'-i think there was some notation on our report cards, and a small list on the student page of the newspaper each semester, but nothing beyond that. as well as i can remember there were no awards given at all-save at the end of the year (4th-12th) when there would be an assembly and kids would get sports awards mostly, some would be handed out for 'good sportsmanship' (these were nice for the kids who gave every effort but were not gifted with great ability-but still supported the school teams), spelling bee/science fair, music stuff. but that was pretty much it.
i don't get the whole 'perfect attendance' thing

i mean, the reality is that the basic expectation is that you attend school every day except those days when school is schedualed off. so these schools are rewarding people for simply doing what is expected of them?

whatever happened to doing something just for the reason it's the expectation-not out of looking to receive accolades for it? the reality is-you don't get awarded in the 'real world' for doing what are the minimum expectations of your job-if your employer expects you there every day, doing that is what you do to keep your job. if the schools are having horrendous problems with attendance it seems they should be addressing those individuals with the attendance issues-holding up someone whose meeting those basic standards is'nt going to solve the problem. and the arguement that the awards encourage those who might not otherwise work towards being there all the time makes me question the values of the student/parent if it's simply a certificate that motivates them to attend.
i remember back in the 80's when i was teaching-there was a big shift where we had to move to a more rewards based style of teaching. stickers, certificates (little photocopied ones) and things that were normaly reserved for preschoolers and k's were introduced into the upper grades. then it got to be that people felt every child should be rewarded for something to 'spare their feelings'-as a result even more stickers and certificates-student of the year became student of the week (and by gosh, make sure every kid got that at least once during the year despite their performance/behaviour

). it just got overblown and out of hand.
i have to wonder if this is why when i moved out of teaching and began supervising employees-i found that over the years many of the younger ones (who would have gone to elementary after this trend got popular) seemed so frustrated when their minimal or even substandard efforts were not rewarded somehow. it was a strange dynamic-you would have someone who truly believed (and was vocal about it) that by virtue of their coming to work each day (on time) and doing exactly what was expected of them they should get some kind of certificate or bonus to reward them. they ignored the fact that those who were'nt doing it were receiving negative attention in the form of less opportunity to promote, suspensions, even terminations-they were realy focused on having themselves held up for reccognition. i have to wonder if it goes back to being rewarded so much in school

i do know that one thing at my job was changed directly because of the mind set of some of these staff-supervisors could not write anything (even a positive thing) in red ink. a certain population of the staff associated red ink immediatly with 'wrong answers' on grade school tests

so policy changed and out got tossed hundreds of red pens
sorry for getting so ot-but i think the schools need to look at the realities of life, and teach kids that 'yes' in some situations stellar work does result in accolades-but for the most part the only real reward for a job well done is the sense of personal satisfaction you feel inside yourself.