PixieDust32
♥ Live ♥ Love♥ Disney ♥
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2005
- Messages
- 12,408
It's on! 

As I boldly predicted back on page 118, Sandra won.
Mind, I was rooting for Parvati. However, as it turned out, while the jury was tar and feathering Russell some of the tar got on Parvati. She was a little too close to Russell, while everyone knew that Sandra hated him and, as she stated at the final tribal council, tried repeatedly to get him out.
I am very, very glad Russell won 'fan favorite' over Rupert.
Russell! We have watched you on every single episode of Survivor for the last two seasons, and you did make it interesting! I predict that Mark Burnett will get him back on another season (like when he brought back Stephanie and Ozzy for that one season). Either that, or cast him on that new show in development (described as a combination of Amazing Race and Survivor).
Many will argue, of course, that Sandra is not a deserving winner. Yet I tend to believe Tom, who said that every winner of a season of Survivor deserved it. I will say this: she is two for two, and the proof of the pudding is in the eatin'.
Randy: the bald look works for James, not for you.
I did think Russell was absolutely correct when he said that he played one long season. If, at the end of Samoa, there had been an immediate vote and reunion show, where he would have learned that his social skills were zip, he would have adjusted his game some for the new season. However, lacking that feedback, all he had to go on was 'Well, it got me to the final tribal council once, so I shall do it again as before".
I thought Jeff (I love how Courtney likes to refer to him formally as "Jeffrey") was pumped up for the reunion show. He knew it had been an excellent season.
He said that now, that he played one game, because he lost again of course! But before the season 20 started he was bragging on an interview that since no one had seen him playing he was going to kick all their butts, because he had that advantage, so he chose to take the risk knowing the pros and cons.
Yeah, but remember Russell EASILY could have been out early on in this season if Tyson hadn't decided to switch his vote last second! Rob had everything all figured out to get Russell eliminated. There was that bit of luck that both Tom and Colby were talking about in the reunion right there!
And now that everyone has seen him play twice, if he is ever on another Survivor he will definitely make it to the finals again, so that the other two with him get a 50/50 chance of winning![]()
Yes! Because he is the best and they will make it to the end because of him! Whatever!The lady at the early show told him to audition for American Idol
because the audience vote
![]()
I can understand why people hate Russell. He's one of those kind of people that you either like or don't like.
I also agree with you about Sandra. She is quite arrogant but some seem to think that it's okay if she is that way but Russell can't be. I don't care for her at all.
As far as her game play and riding coat tails. It seems that that kind of player tends to win a lot.
I really wish something had been said about the Coach/Jerri thing that seemed to be blooming.
And I would have liked to have heard what the players thought about Russell after watching him from last season. Would they have voted him out quickly, etc. Rob did say when they were doing the tribute that they voted him off when they should have.
Another example of Rusell's one-way strategy. I made a post earlier that Russell's strategy is not as deep as some may think. He bullies the "dumb" people. Last season he looked for weak-willed people to bully around, his so-called, "dumb girls" alliance. Tyson is another one who fits the "dumb" profile, so Russell targeted him as well. It was a game changer and I do give Russell kudos for being able to ID these types of people.
I don't, however, think it's a great strategy. Getting dumb people to do dumb things is very easy (this is what Russell does). Getting smart people to do dumb things is something worthy of praise...Russell never found a way to get the smart people to do the dumb things. He's one of the most entertaining characters of all time on Survivor, but he's far from being one of the best players of all time.
Love it![]()
For being so smart you would think that Russell would understand America sees what Survivor wants them to see, so even his winning the fan vote is because the way they edit him. He is a loser in every respect of the word, the people who played the game with him knew it (twice) and most of the people watching know it, someday maybe Russell will figure it out too![]()
I thought it was interesting Colby mentioned they were restricted from exploring the island and swimming this season...something he enjoyed in previous seasons. I didn't think about it until he mentioned it. I wonder why they were restricted this season?
Glad Russell didn't win but he'll be back in another season...he's such good tv Burnett won't let him fade away.
I thought Tyson looked scary last night...kinda like a witch. Straggly hair and not quite enough facial hair to make a full goatee. Jerri looked better on the show than last night...I wonder who makes these people up?
Romber's baby is cute.
I have a question for the Survivor experts.
I thought that this season was filming before the last one aired on TV. Is that correct?
If so, there was no way that any of the players had seen Russell play or for Russell to know that outcome of that season. But....before they went to the final tribal to decide the winner, There is a shot of Russell sitting on a rock high above the water and it's pretty obvious that it's a green screen behind him. During his interview he makes a statement along the lines of last time he took the weak players with and since that didn't work, this time he was changing his game plan and taking prior winners.
How could he have know that he didn't win his first game if he played "one long game"?
I think that CBS has some explaining to do.![]()
I have a question for the Survivor experts.
I thought that this season was filming before the last one aired on TV. Is that correct?
If so, there was no way that any of the players had seen Russell play or for Russell to know that outcome of that season. But....before they went to the final tribal to decide the winner, There is a shot of Russell sitting on a rock high above the water and it's pretty obvious that it's a green screen behind him. During his interview he makes a statement along the lines of last time he took the weak players with and since that didn't work, this time he was changing his game plan and taking prior winners.
How could he have know that he didn't win his first game if he played "one long game"?
Well Im no expert! But I seen on another shows that the production shoot 2 different interviews.
They could had done that, they might told Russell to say I didn't win, and another one saying that we won, but just very simple without much details.
I think that CBS has some explaining to do.![]()