After my 3rd tour, I started seriously contemplating purchasing DVC. But that has just raised more questions!
About us: We're a family of 5 Disney fans, not fanatics. Over the past 5 years, we've gone 3 times for about a week each time. Over the past 10, we've gone 4 times. Over the past 15, we've gone 6 times. So the frequency is going up, but it would be safe to say we'd at least visit every other year and would look to rent out (or bank) the years we don't. Our typical time frames for going would be the week before Easter, or the week before Labor Day. How's the demand during these two times? I know the parks tend to get slower around this time, but not if the DVC demand drops as well.
Financially, I'm doing my research and my main competitor would be AoA where we primarily stay. To get something comparable (ie, 2 baths, 2 real beds) we'd be relegated to either BLT 1 BR, or 2 BR every where else. That means we'd need 250-300 points. Any higher and I don't think there is a breakeven with how we currently travel. Unfortunately even using CAGR, the maintenance fees and time horizon are the biggest wild cards.
Going with something like BWV, OKW, or BRV would reduce the risk due to shorter contracts; but they come in slightly under the breakeven when the contract expires. Surprisingly VGF, PBV, CCV would be able to breakeven and even comes in as a deal; but that's a heavy assumption that the maintenance dues carry their current CAGRs (2.8%, 3.0%, 3.5%, 2.3% respectively). Part of me suspects those numbers are lower because they're so new.
We think AK 2 BR lockout and BLT 1 BR would probably be the most comparable to what we'd get with AoA in terms of what's important to us. We acknowledge there'd be gains and losses in various areas; but we feel that's where the bulk of our stay would be - regardless of where we bought. With 10 Value 2BR LO, 30 Standard BLT 1 BR, and 121 AK 2 BR overall, we think we should be ok. Is that a relatively safe assumption?
So here's the dilemma. I fully acknowledge that SSR is the undisputed value king and seems to never have an availability issue, but we don't really have a huge desire to stay at SSR. But in comparing them to AK, they're expiring in similar time frames with similar purchase ranges. SSR being $1.00/pt for maintenance and a history of lower increases offers a lot of value - but will it jump up with the refurbishment? Alternatively, I imagine vet bills for giraffe's add up as they age right? If history holds we'd technically be able to buy more points at SSR - 300 vs 250 at AK for the same total cost. So would that be a better option, despite our primary stays to open up some other resorts to be able to book?
**We would love to buy BWV or BCV as our optimal resort, but that math will never work out for us. The poly would be great if they had more than studios or slept 5.
and it seems to breakeven with the way we travel (We're AoA people) we'd be looking at some of the more value based DVCs (SSR) or roll the dice on a long contract and hope the CAGR holds for others (ie, VGF, PBV, CCV)
About us: We're a family of 5 Disney fans, not fanatics. Over the past 5 years, we've gone 3 times for about a week each time. Over the past 10, we've gone 4 times. Over the past 15, we've gone 6 times. So the frequency is going up, but it would be safe to say we'd at least visit every other year and would look to rent out (or bank) the years we don't. Our typical time frames for going would be the week before Easter, or the week before Labor Day. How's the demand during these two times? I know the parks tend to get slower around this time, but not if the DVC demand drops as well.
Financially, I'm doing my research and my main competitor would be AoA where we primarily stay. To get something comparable (ie, 2 baths, 2 real beds) we'd be relegated to either BLT 1 BR, or 2 BR every where else. That means we'd need 250-300 points. Any higher and I don't think there is a breakeven with how we currently travel. Unfortunately even using CAGR, the maintenance fees and time horizon are the biggest wild cards.
Going with something like BWV, OKW, or BRV would reduce the risk due to shorter contracts; but they come in slightly under the breakeven when the contract expires. Surprisingly VGF, PBV, CCV would be able to breakeven and even comes in as a deal; but that's a heavy assumption that the maintenance dues carry their current CAGRs (2.8%, 3.0%, 3.5%, 2.3% respectively). Part of me suspects those numbers are lower because they're so new.
We think AK 2 BR lockout and BLT 1 BR would probably be the most comparable to what we'd get with AoA in terms of what's important to us. We acknowledge there'd be gains and losses in various areas; but we feel that's where the bulk of our stay would be - regardless of where we bought. With 10 Value 2BR LO, 30 Standard BLT 1 BR, and 121 AK 2 BR overall, we think we should be ok. Is that a relatively safe assumption?
So here's the dilemma. I fully acknowledge that SSR is the undisputed value king and seems to never have an availability issue, but we don't really have a huge desire to stay at SSR. But in comparing them to AK, they're expiring in similar time frames with similar purchase ranges. SSR being $1.00/pt for maintenance and a history of lower increases offers a lot of value - but will it jump up with the refurbishment? Alternatively, I imagine vet bills for giraffe's add up as they age right? If history holds we'd technically be able to buy more points at SSR - 300 vs 250 at AK for the same total cost. So would that be a better option, despite our primary stays to open up some other resorts to be able to book?
**We would love to buy BWV or BCV as our optimal resort, but that math will never work out for us. The poly would be great if they had more than studios or slept 5.
and it seems to breakeven with the way we travel (We're AoA people) we'd be looking at some of the more value based DVCs (SSR) or roll the dice on a long contract and hope the CAGR holds for others (ie, VGF, PBV, CCV)