tinkerbellcruiser
Earning My Ears
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2006
- Messages
- 16
Thanks so much for the spreadsheet!
Well I was just trying to humoursly make the point that for the most part these calculations are academic, not reality. Almost none of us would otherwise have spent X amount on Disney hotels every year for the next few decades. So, if we really wouldn't have spent it, then we haven't really "saved" that money by going with DVC. Go out and buy the biggest TV you can find that is on sale and try to convince the spouse that you have "saved" money. I've tried, it doesn't work.
Ultimately, this is the way I like to look at it:
Regular Dining Plan: You are committing to Disney one sit-down meal per day. You prepay for this, and in return, Disney will give you one "free" Quick-Service meal, and one free snack per day.
Quick Service Dining Plan: You are committing to two quick-service meals per day. You prepay for this, and in return, Disney will give you two "free" snacks per day, plus a resort refill mug for free.
Deluxe Dining Plan: You are committing to Disney two sit-down meals per day. You prepay for this, and in return, Disney will give you one "free" sit-down meal, appetizers for all your meals and two free snacks per day.
As a fellow math geekI applaud this thread.
:
Loved it all, and I also made a spreadsheet to ease my mind that DVC was the way to go, (and have maintained a running log comparing the investment to the "Rack Rates" I would have paid for the time in "the World") but all us math guys missed the point . . . . . . the reason to buy DVC is the Magic it brings into your life . . . the look on your DW or DH's face when planning the next adventure!Priceless!
Did you put taxes into the calculation for the paid stays? This is something we don't pay but cash guests do. I think it is well over 10%.
So, i'm a math geek.
Just looking at the basic numbers, I knew DVC was far worth the cost of ownership. However, reading these boards, there are lots of people out there that use arguments like "well, if you finance it's not worth it." or "There are always coupons to use to get a discount."
So I made a spreadsheet to see just how true (or untrue) these claims were. The numbers prove that, by far, buying DVC (even when you pay full price, finance it, and no incentives) is a MUCH better value.
Just to explain the numbers: I assumed that you paid $112 per point (current retail price). No incentives on that cost. I did it based on 182 points (one week, magic kingdom view studio at Bay Lake Towers in September). I also checked the rack rate for the same room at the same time of year: $2,953 for a week.
So the numbers I ran were: Total cost (including annual dues) if you paid cash and didn't finance it for the full life of the contract. Total cost if you financed it for 10 years at Disney's standard financing rate (14.25%). I also ran the cash cost for the same time. I assumed a 5% annual increase in both annual dues and the cash rate for the room.
Here is the spreadsheet:
![]()
Break-even point on cash rate vs. non-financed purchase: 7 years
Break-even point on cash rate vs. financed purchase: 12 years
Break-even point on 40% discounted cash rate vs. non-financed: 14 years
Break-even point on 40% discounted cash rate vs financed: 21 years
Best case (non-financed, full rack rate cash) DVC savings over the life of the contract: $457,988.73
Worst case (financed, 40% discount cash rate) DVC savings over the life of the contract: $192,674.57
So, even if you financed DVC at the worst disney rate and were somehow able to score a 40% discount code for every annual visit, you will still save almost $200,000 with DVC over the 50 year life of the contract.