~Oh no, I feel very bad for them -- there is something very wrong when someone argues their opinion as facts. I have yet to see anything credible, logical, or even sensible to suggest why I can't express enthusiasm regarding the implementation of Fastpass+. Back when most of these posters were arguing about late fastpass affecting standby, I was closely following FP+, it wass xPass back then. They're just jumping on the bandwagon, they don't know jack! There were many great CM's who used to frequent this board and still do, who were kind enough to warn us in advance, that fastpass return times would be enforced and some of these same posters were arguing back with them that it would never happen! So there you go.
~LOL. This is what happens when an argument is weak and void of any facts. Instead, arguing Fastpass+, my post is taken out of context and given a nasty name -- typical ad hom, fallacious, nasty bully behavior -- attack the poster who is perceived to be the weakest link, because it is in their nature to be hateful and spiteful, as they have nothing else to give. We have no real data, FP+ has not been released yet, but some here feel they know more than others, but they don't know *anything* -- so I just sit back and laugh at them!
~They can't help it, it's in their nature to be nasty, I think their behavior is disgusting. I'm so glad I don't have to resort to tearing others apart in order to prove some lame point. When, I make an argument, I make sure I have facts not high strung emotions and useless opinions. And, that poster who misquoted me and those who agree with it, have proved only one thing.