So Hillary, How about those papers?

DawnCt1

<font color=red>I had to wonder what "holiday" he
Joined
May 17, 2004
Messages
30,053
From the campaign that promises "transparency", where are the papers and why can't they be seen. This seems to be the first time in recent history where the 'papers' of the first lady have been ordered to be kept under wraps. It's been 3 years since 300 FOI requests have been submitted. This is certainly more important than Socks the Cat, particularly from a candidate who insists that she is prepared to be president and in reality, hasn't achieved much. She did vote to fund $1 million dollars for the Woodstock Museum however. That's a good use of taxpayer money.



How Much Information Can You Really Get From the Clinton Library?
Monday, October 22, 2007
By Brit Hume

Information Please

The author of a new book about the Clinton White House years says she was stonewalled during her attempts to get information at the Clinton Presidential Library in Arkansas. Sally Bedell Smith — author of "For Love of Politics" — says her requests for memos and records dealing with Hillary Clinton's role as First Lady were denied.

Newsweek reports the national archives says barely one-half of one percent of the 78 million pages of documents and 20 million e-mails stored at the library are open to the public. Nearly 300 Freedom of Information requests are pending for Clinton documents — and an archives spokeswoman says it is hard to predict if any of the material will be released before next year's election.

In the past Bill Clinton has blamed the Bush administration for the backlog. But Newsweek says documents it uncovered indicate that Mr. Clinton gave the archives private instructions to tightly control the release of presidential documents. This comes despite promises of transparency by Hillary Clinton — who once said about the library — "Everything's going to be available."
 
If you were the least bit serious about disclosures and not placing partisanship above all else, you'd be howling mad that this administration has chosen to instruct it's members to ignore Congressional subpoenas on a variety of topics.

But you're not. No surprise there.

Please continue with your attempts to throw anything you can up against the wall smearing those whose political philosophies you disagree with. Much like the fable of the Boy Who Cried Wolf, by continuing to utilize this tactic you only serve to diminish the effectiveness of the occasional point you bring up that actually does matter.
 
Maybe the "transparency" comment has been taken "out of context." I'm betting she has just a teeny weeny bit to hide. Yup, her life is an open book. The trick is in finding the book!
 

I sense Sandy Berger suddenly having an extreme urge and interest in visiting the Clinton Library!
 
If you were the least bit serious about disclosures and not placing partisanship above all else, you'd be howling mad that this administration has chosen to instruct it's members to ignore Congressional subpoenas on a variety of topics.

But you're not. No surprise there.

Please continue with your attempts to throw anything you can up against the wall smearing those whose political philosophies you disagree with. Much like the fable of the Boy Who Cried Wolf, by continuing to utilize this tactic you only serve to diminish the effectiveness of the occasional point you bring up that actually does matter.

How ironic, you making this statement....
 
Why should they be released? They are considered part of the presidential records that are filed in the archives of the Clinton presidential library.

It is actually thanks to GWB that the documents aren't released -check out the Executive Order that he signed on Nov. 1, 2001. A sitting president has the ability to keep signed any presidential records of current or previous presidents, including his daddy and Pres. Clinton.

He refused to release his records as Governor of Texas prior to the 2000 or 2004 elections (I don't think he has even now). How does this differ?
 
Why should they be released? She was a private citizen when her husband was president.
Has any other First Lady let public all her private mail?

:confused3
 
:sad2: :surfweb:

I am at the point where I need to quit opening posts started by the OP.
 
Why should they be released? They are considered part of the presidential records that are filed in the archives of the Clinton presidential library.

It is actually thanks to GWB that the documents aren't released -check out the Executive Order that he signed on Nov. 1, 2001. A sitting president has the ability to keep signed any presidential records of current or previous presidents, including his daddy and Pres. Clinton.

He refused to release his records as Governor of Texas prior to the 2000 or 2004 elections (I don't think he has even now). How does this differ?

"But what about her role in other issues? Did she ever commit her thoughts on welfare reform to paper? What did she think of the government shutdown fight with Newt Gingrich? Are there memos describing her role in the travel office firings that have never been made public? How about the controversial pardons in the last days of her husband's presidency? Did she ever secretly meet as first lady with some of the lightning-rod figures from Whitewater, the campaign finance scandals or the Monica Lewinsky case?

We may never find out before Election Day next year. Judicial Watch, a watchdog group that peppered the Clinton administration with lawsuits during the 1990s, filed a lawsuit July 16 asking a federal court in Washington to order the National Archives and Records Administration to give it Hillary Clinton's calendars, daily office diaries, schedule and telephone logs from Jan. 20, 1993, to Jan. 20, 2001. The group filed the suit after waiting for more than a year with no reply to its April 5, 2006, request under the Freedom of Information Act submitted to the archives, which operates the William J. Clinton Presidential Library.

"With Hillary Clinton aggressively pursuing the presidency, uncovering the truth about her activities in the White House is just as relevant today as it was during the Clinton era," said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch.

Then came a report in the Los Angeles Times this week that the Clinton library in Arkansas says nearly 2 million pages of documents related to the first lady's office probably won't be processed for release in time for the election. Under normal procedures, archives officials must review each requested document line by line for material considered classified, private or confidential communications before it can be released.
 
Yes, I am a liberal as stated <------. I respect everyone's right to believe as they wish but the OP seems to have a driving need to post anything she hears/sees/reads that is derogatory to the Democrats or liberals.

Now I believe all kinds of negative things about the current adm. and a lot of others in D.C. but don't feel the need to post about it....I figure if you are wanting information to fuel the fire you certainly know where to get it.

Sometimes I enjoy items posted by the OP. I have learned to respect her on other levels but this is getting a bit much tonight. :confused3
 
Yes, I am a liberal as stated <------. I respect everyone's right to believe as they wish but the OP seems to have a driving need to post anything she hears/sees/reads that is derogatory to the Democrats or liberals.

Now I believe all kinds of negative things about the current adm. and a lot of others in D.C. but don't feel the need to post about it....I figure if you are wanting information to fuel the fire you certainly know where to get it.

Sometimes I enjoy items posted by the OP. I have learned to respect her on other levels but this is getting a bit much tonight. :confused3

Wasn't it Bette Davis who said, "buckle your seatbelts, its going to be a bumpy ride". Hillary will provide lots of material for the coming year and after then hopefully after election, she will fade back into her Senate seat.;)
 
Wasn't it Bette Davis who said, "buckle your seatbelts, its going to be a bumpy ride". Hillary will provide lots of material for the coming year and after then hopefully after election, she will fade back into her Senate seat.;)

We can hope! :)
 
Wasn't it Bette Davis who said, "buckle your seatbelts, its going to be a bumpy ride". Hillary will provide lots of material for the coming year and after then hopefully after election, she will fade back into her Senate seat.;)


Hey Dawn, I heard Hillary passed gas at a staff meeting this morning. You'd better start a thread about it. :rotfl:
 
Hey Dawn, I heard Hillary passed gas at a staff meeting this morning. You'd better start a thread about it. :rotfl:

Alright...no laughing about potty themes! I thought we'd moved past the 4-5 year old stage.....now, 5 minutes in the bathroom for you where you can discuss potty themes all by yourself. Oh, wait...I'm not talking to my 5 year old son.....:rotfl2:
 
Hey Dawn, I heard Hillary passed gas at a staff meeting this morning. You'd better start a thread about it. :rotfl:

In the meantime the "current occupant" has been 'messing' all over the Constitution. I wonder who'll notice THAT?
 







Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE


New Posts





DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom