slo's TUESDAY 1/14 poll - Riding On A Subway

Riding A Subway - Questions in post below ⬇️

  • Yes - as a child (0 - 17j

    Votes: 33 30.8%
  • Yes - as a young adult (18 - 30)

    Votes: 69 64.5%
  • Yes - as a middle age adult (31 - 45)

    Votes: 62 57.9%
  • Yes - as an older adult (46 - 64)

    Votes: 53 49.5%
  • Yes - as a senior citizen

    Votes: 9 8.4%
  • No - I never ridden a subway

    Votes: 17 15.9%
  • I rode it to work

    Votes: 18 16.8%
  • I rode it on vacation

    Votes: 63 58.9%
  • It was my way of transportation everywhere

    Votes: 9 8.4%
  • Other - please post your answer

    Votes: 12 11.2%

  • Total voters
    107
I've never been anywhere that had a subway. I'm not sure if I ever will. I'd imagine I'd ride it if so though.
 

I have ridden MARTA in Atlanta a number of times through the years. I'm not a fan but sometimes if you want to go to a Braves game, or the Fox Theater, or just about anywhere downtown, parking is an issue so it's easier. I've been on the rail in Chicago but it wasn't underground like a subway so I'm not sure if that counts.
 
If we count the EL, many times as a youth, young adult, middle age and young senior. If limited to the subway Downtown, then on up through older adult. Chicago to Wrigley and Downtown. Then in DC and Boston. I think that's it.
 
Places where I have lived didn't have any type of sub-way. Have ridden 'trams' at various airports but not the type relating to public transportation if that is what you are asking. I think the replies to your survey are more a reflection of where people live since some cities have them while many do not.
 
Only on vacations--NYC,around Europe.
I didn’t vote in the poll (too cumbersome with all the age categories) but I’ve ridden commuter train/transit systems in lots of places we’ve visited too. The are AWESOME in Europe. The underground station in Monaco was literally more beautiful and more interesting than some of the tourist sites we visited. :laughing:

Our local public transit consists of an extensive system of underground, surface and elevated tracks. I mostly get around I’m my own vehicle but I certainly have ridden it many times over the years.
 
It's mainly been for fun vacation related travel, but I did have a few trips back in the mid to late 90s where I was contemplating a move back to the NYC metro area and it's pretty much a way of life up there. I took it around for some interviews, fairs, and seminars. Of course, I grew up in that area and never realized how lacking other cities were with public transport like this until I moved away. On a related note, I have a cousin who grew up in Brooklyn who only "recently" learned how to drive. We're going on about 10 years, but she was in her 40s at the time and finally hit a point in life where she needed to use a car on a regular basis. So, I guess it's kind of the reverse of the never on a subway story. I will say that some make a lot more sense than others. I seem to recall Paris having one of the easiest subways to navigate. NYC and London don't feel as straightforward, but you do get the hang of it.
 
I’ve ridden subways in many cities and countries for both work and pleasure.

The most memorable trips:
Our first trip to NY. We were used to Atlanta’s Marta which does not have the concept of local or express trains. The train pulled up. We tried to figure out if it was an express or local. It left with us still standing on the platform. We were quicker for future rides.

In Rome towards the end of a weeklong vacation we had got cocky and felt like we really knew the Rome Metro. Then me and the kids got on and my wife did not. She waved as we pulled away. We had planned for the scenario and agreed we would just meet up at the intended stop. About 15 minutes after we arrived my wife arrived.
 
I grew up in Philly. To me, there was the subway (and now I'm thinking of hoagies) that were underground and the commuter trains that were mostly above ground and a little underground.

I think there’s some confusion about what is considered a subway. By strict definition, it is an underground train. However, many large cities with public transportation have trains with above ground sections, as well as underground sections, and are still called subways. Often, the outer stations, away from the inner city or “downtown” areas, are outside trains. So you might get in the train underground and end up at your destination above ground, without changing trains.

The NYC subway system, for example, is underground in Manhattan, but also goes to the boroughs of Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx, via tunnels under the river (because Manhattan is an island). Most stations outside of Manhattan are either at grade level or on elevated platforms (also referred to as the El). Similarly, the DC Metro runs underground within the district/city, but also connects to the suburbs in MD and VA, where many of the stations are also above ground/outdoors. Same with Boston, same with London. (In New York, there are also separate commuter lines, not part of the subway, that connect Manhattan with some of the northern counties, CT, NJ, and Long Island.)
 
I think there’s some confusion about what is considered a subway.

I thought the same thing when I noticed this survey. To me 'public transportation' is a more generic term and that might include bus/train/subway/cable car/etc. Depends more on where you live (what options are available) and how you choose to get around.
 
Last edited:
Actually, now that I think back, we also rode the subway in St Petersburg, Russia back when we did a Baltic Cruise. I remember the escalator down was so long you couldn’t see the bottom for quite a bit of time. It was probably the most beautiful underground station I’d ever seen.
 
I think there’s some confusion about what is considered a subway. By strict definition, it is an underground train. However, many large cities with public transportation have trains with above ground sections, as well as underground sections, and are still called subways. Often, the outer stations, away from the inner city or “downtown” areas, are outside trains. So you might get in the train underground and end up at your destination above ground, without changing trains.

The NYC subway system, for example, is underground in Manhattan, but also goes to the boroughs of Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx, via tunnels under the river (because Manhattan is an island). Most stations outside of Manhattan are either at grade level or on elevated platforms (also referred to as the El). Similarly, the DC Metro runs underground within the district/city, but also connects to the suburbs in MD and VA, where many of the stations are also above ground/outdoors. Same with Boston, same with London. (In New York, there are also separate commuter lines, not part of the subway, that connect Manhattan with some of the northern counties, CT, NJ, and Long Island.)
To me, the EL is another whole different train. hmmmm I might have to look up the transit system in Philly.
 
I rode the subway in Philly to my high school every day. We got free student bus tokens from the school district if we lived more than a mile away from my magnet school.
When was this? late 60's/early 70's we had to pay for tokens. Septa strike, we still had to get to school. About 1.5 miles. During teachers strike seniors were sent to one high school, even further away, still had to pay.
 
Rode subways almost daily when going to college in Boston. Also when doing touristy things there as an adult. We've also been on them in N.Y.C., London and Paris when on vacation.
 












Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top