dngnb8
Disneyphile
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2011
- Messages
- 3,717
Compliments are acknowledging another's appreciation of something, sure there can be an implied respect, but it's not a mandate.
If there isnt respect, how can it be a compliment?
Compliments are acknowledging another's appreciation of something, sure there can be an implied respect, but it's not a mandate.
If there isnt respect, how can it be a compliment?
If there isnt respect, how can it be a compliment?
Yeah I don't get that either. There is a huge difference between "Wow! You are gorgeous!" and "I want to tap that!"
Anytime I've been told something like that I have found it a compliment no matter how attracted or unattracted to the person saying it I was.
I don't see how the two are related. I want to jump your bones is a crude way of saying you are attractive. I don't care if the person who finds me attractive respects me. They don't even know me.
Anytime I've been told something like that I have found it a compliment no matter how attracted or unattracted to the person saying it I was.
What it says is
Youre attractive enough for personal pleasure. Wanting to "jump your bones" doesnt imply you have respect for them, just for your needs which can be influenced by things like, booze (2 am dates), lack of attention (its been so long I would do so and so), among other things.
Its not really a compliment if you ask me, just a statement that your rocks need tending too.
If there isnt respect, how can it be a compliment?
Yeah I don't get that either. There is a huge difference between "Wow! You are gorgeous!"and "I want to tap that!"
![]()
Which, depending on the circumstances and the woman it's directed at, may even be taken as a threat.
It's really contextual.
No difference, some compliments get more to someone's deeper emotions, others are just surface deep. Let's be honest here, physical attraction, no matter what anyone says, does matter. If someone finds me physically attractive because I take good care of myself, great, that's a compliment, even if it's just skin deep.
Ziemkiewicz, his boyfriend, Guillaume Coudé-Levesque, and three friends were leaving the Lookout Bar in Byward Market when Ziemkiewicz spotted a cute guy standing on the curb near the Chateau Lafayette on York St.
As Ziemkiewicz passed the guy, he said, Im not angry at that. When the guy said, F. you, Ziemkiewicz retorted, Maybe later Im busy right now.
I can't help but wonder if Dan got beat up twice this night. Once by the cute guy and once more by his boyfriend when they got home for commenting/hitting on cute guy.![]()
I do wonder if it's a man vs woman thing. Though men can obviously be victims of sexual assault, it's much more likely to be man-on-woman violence. If a random stranger says "I'd do that," a woman is much more likely to feel like the next line might be "And I just might, whether you like it or not." I suspect very few men would take a sexually charged "compliment" as a threat. And again, it might be why the "cute guy" was more threatened by Dan than he would have been by the same comment made by a woman. Even if all of this is very subconscious, it could still be there. The bottom line is, many women are taught to be afraid of strangers who are sexually attracted to them*. Few men are.
Just my theory.
(*Yes, I know, rape is an act of violence, not sexual desire. But that's how it's carried out, so that's the context.)
Then again, I also believe people put too much emphasis on sex and associate sex with love.
You people are outta your ever lovin' minds.
I wanna tap that, I'm not angry at that, I'd hit that...NOT compliments. Don't people even know the difference between a complement and some creep making lewd remarks to them anymore?
You want to complement someone, it's suppose to make them feel good. I don't know how strung out some people are for a complement but the terms up top aren't words people use to make YOU feel good. They use them to put a lewd ownership on you.
Holy Crap, we are in trouble if people can't even ferret out a complement from some creep making a nasty, lewd, disgusting comment, .
Color me picky, but some pig randomly shouting he'd like to do me doesn't impress me.
Here's a story about a similar circumstance, but with school kids: http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local/ventura_county&id=8329043
So, the defense is arguing that because this kid was abused when he was younger, and because the other kid's comments/actions made him uncomfortable, he shouldn't be held responsible for his actions. They say he couldn't contain his anger.
Is there ever a justification for murder? Especially when the murdered person never physically harmed the killer? Just because he was made uncomfortable and didn't know how to deal with the other kid's sexuality, his openness, even his taunting, is that justification? During this case, people have actually argued that this young, gay kid was too obvious in his clothing, his actions. They say he went too far in being open about who he was. Is that justification for killing (or even for a fight)?
Not in my world.