jodifla
WDW lover since 1972
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2002
- Messages
- 11,605
I was largely joking when I referred to it as back pay, but really I think that's a reasonable way to see it for those who have a huge issue with alimony. If I had been working, we would have paid someone else to do what I do, and that someone else would have reaped the benefits of payments into the state pension system too. Funnily enough, most SAHPs have virtually no pension to speak of after years of work simply because the family chooses to save on the expense of paying somebody to do the job that must be done. If it is reasonable to pay someone else to do it, it's not unreasonable to consider it worth something of value to the family when the SAHP does it.
I totally agree.
Once person doesn't make the decision so one person should not be penalized. A family decides this together for the good of all involved.
The debate seems to be that stay at home parents should realize things can change. Making the decision to stay home is a risk in the event of a divorce.