The true victim in that case is the owner of the Domino's store. I hope he was able to get some type of compensation because his life would have never been the same. What a shame.
I'm a bit confused on the part where the court recommended that the child become a ward of the state so the parents could save themselves. Maybe the court deemed the parents unfit to provide appropriate care and treatment to what sounds like a child with major behavioral issues? I believe you that the rights were terminated, but the court almost never severs parental rights to outright benefit the parents. It's almost always about what is in the best interest of the child.
Those types of cases fascinate me; the nature vs nurture aspect. I'm assuming the other children were fairly normally behaved, so why did a middle child have such major behavioral issues?
This was in the early 80s and I'm sure things were different then.
He began the abuse at the age of 9. As he grew older, the abuse changed to different forms of violence, including the tormenting and killing of animals. At the age of 15, his parents and everyone else involved had tried treatment, counseling, and everything else they could do. The best interest of this child was intense therapy, which could not be provided by the parents. They were promised their son would get the intense therapy he needed, but even as a ward of the state they could not control him.
At one of the hearings for a crime that was committed, which was a carjacking, it was advised the parents terminate parental rights.
All the other children were well behaved. Never did I say he was a middle child because he was not. All of the other children attended college and a few have advanced degrees.
The parents were not deemed unfit. They had done everything they could and so did the "system." It was incredibly tragic for all involved, especially his mother. She is still good friends with my mom, and it was talked about a lot in our house because the mom used my mom as a sounding board. The mom still struggles today.
If this boy was a child of today, he would have been diagnosed with oppositional defiance disorder and a host of other mental illnesses. The treatment would probably be different because there have been advances. And there have been changes in the legal and youth services systems since then.