Sen. Boxer/Condy Rice

[dmadman43]

Back that with anything?

The fact that France Germany and Russia said they had no interest in going into Iraq no matter who got elected.

 

[dmadman43]

Actually, that's not true either. Quite a few Democrats made it clear that their yes vote only meant that they believed that bush was entitled to have the cabinet of his choosing....no matter how lousy the choice. Their vote did not have anything to do with their opinion of Rice's abilities or lack thereof.

I guess they figure if he wants a liar advising him, so be it.

I find it amusing the Dems are now apoplectic about possibly having liars in office.

 

[Rokkitsci]

Here is an account from a foriegn paper of the debate in the Senate. See http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,12063631%5E2703,00.html The foriegn press has not missed what happend in this debate. Everyone now knows that Condi is a liar and this will affect her job performance.

Bet, you haven not presented your analysis of the New York Times article that you demanded that I provide you the link to. You stated last night that you wanted to review the article because this article was the source of many of the attacks by the Democrats against Condi. What is the status of your review?

This is - of course - the only objective of the Democrats. They want to feed the anti-American foreign press with as much ammo as possible to make Condi's job as hard as possible.
This is what steams me about the current Democrat nasty-machine. All they want to do is creat chaos and cause damage - in fact they are employing the same tactics as terrorists. They know they have been relegated to the trash can with their ideas - all they have left now is to create as much misery and ******* as possible.
Democrats have no agenda now. They are shown to be mere obstructionists and professional whiners. They will ally themselves with any foreign influence to obstruct progress here.
In my view, the national Democrat party are now a seditious element in the USA. I am disgusted with them. They make me sick.

 

[Rokkitsci]

You're so busy trying to find people to think for you, you can't even keep track of who you are responding to. Now that is amusing. I never demanded any NYT article. Why would I demand to read anything from the fish-wrapping?

Thank you dmadman - I admire your stamina. I don't see how you keep up the good attitude you have.
I am unable to devote the time to respond to these malcontents the way I would like. You are doing a great job. Keep it up. Many of us are reading your posts and applauding, even if we don't take the time to contribute.

 

[Charade]

Actually, that's not true either. Quite a few Democrats made it clear that their yes vote only meant that they believed that bush was entitled to have the cabinet of his choosing....no matter how lousy the choice. Their vote did not have anything to do with their opinion of Rice's abilities or lack thereof.

WOW! What backbone they exhibited!!! Why on earth did they vote yes if they didn't think she was qualified and a lousy choice??? That explanation makes so little sense.

Either she's qualified or not.

Is this an example of "I voted against Rice before I voted for her"?

 

[Laura]

You're so busy trying to find people to think for you, you can't even keep track of who you are responding to. Now that is amusing. I never demanded any NYT article. Why would I demand to read anything from the fish-wrapping?

WWTBAMFAN was posting to Bet (bsnyder), not you.

 

[Laura]

This is - of course - the only objective of the Democrats. They want to feed the anti-American foreign press with as much ammo as possible to make Condi's job as hard as possible.

Publishing the truth will probably do that, but TOO BAD! Besides, the foreign press was kinda already anti-American, thanks to ol' W.

This is what steams me about the current Democrat nasty-machine. All they want to do is creat chaos and cause damage - in fact they are employing the same tactics as terrorists. They know they have been relegated to the trash can with their ideas - all they have left now is to create as much misery and ******* as possible.
Democrats have no agenda now. They are shown to be mere obstructionists and professional whiners. They will ally themselves with any foreign influence to obstruct progress here.
In my view, the national Democrat party are now a seditious element in the USA. I am disgusted with them. They make me sick.

No agenda... that's hilarious!
This is the 2004 platform: http://a9.g.akamai.net/7/9/8082/v002/www.democrats.org/pdfs/2004platform.pdf
We have a HUGE agenda--basically, everything the conservatives don't care about, which is a lot. In fact, it may be too much, too broad. I think the DNC needs to be more proactive than reactive to the Bush administration is all. There are so many things that I personally, as a Democrat, plan to fight for in the next four years. The environment (preventing global warming, fossil fuel dependence, deforestation), poverty, animal welfare, improving the pay of the military, preserving reproductive rights, and so on and so forth. And that's just me!

I voted for Nader in 2000 because I thought there wasn't much difference between the Republicans and the Democrats. Not to bash Republicans (because I agree with a lot of the fiscal conservative viewpoints), but I was very wrong about that. Sure, I'll vote for a Republican here and there, but I know the DNC has my interests at heart. After Kerry's concession speech Nov. 3, I was really downhearted. But I bounced back, and so will the rest of the Democrats, if they haven't already.

What's Bush's agenda for the next four years? That inaugural address was pretty vague: "freedom here, freedom there, freedom everywhere". Nice idea, but how does he plan to do that? (Bomb Iran? Make nice with the French?) And Social Security reform--yeah, that'll happen. Maybe a permanent tax cut will happen--things like that, but Bush isn't going to leave much of a legacy outside of Iraq. And that legacy, well, it stinks.

 

[superbird]

I am still waiting for the democrats agenda you were going to list. You listed topics but never what the plan was. Sort of like Kerry. Had a plan for everything that would be announced after the election. Well the election is way over and if he even cared about America in the slightest he would have released this plan to get the troops home sooner blah,blah, blah. Please let me know there plans we could all use a laugh!!!!

 

[orvilleair]

Sen. Clinton voted for her. With all the fuss, I was expecting more Democrats to vote against Rice.

 

[peachgirl]

I find it amusing the Dems are now apoplectic about possibly having liars in office.

And I find it amusing that right wingers, you know the ones who just love to sit on their moral high horses, no longer care whether liars are in office. Even when the lies they tell actually affect their jobs.

 

[WWTBAMFAN]

You're so busy trying to find people to think for you, you can't even keep track of who you are responding to. Now that is amusing. I never demanded any NYT article. Why would I demand to read anything from the fish-wrapping?

LOL. dmadman I do not care what you think but I do find your attempt to argue amusing. BTW, I am still laughing at your attack on Senator Dayton. When you can not defeat the logic of a post, just attack the source.

Bet had challenged me several times a couple of nights ago to post the link the October 3, 2004 NYT articles that all of the Democrats used to establish that Condi is a liar. Bet was stupid enough to accuse me of lying and not having read the NYT artilce. Bet was goiing to read the entire article (it is a long and well written article) and prove that I was a liar. LOL I find it amusing that the article has been provided to Bet and she had not either apologize or provided her analyisi why this article does not prove that Condi is a liar. The reason for this is that Condi is a liar.

The last five Sec. of State all were approved by the Senate without any no votes. Condi got more no votes than any other Sec. of State including Kissinger and Al Haig. That is impressive.

 

[bsnyder]

LOL. dmadman I do not care what you think but I do find your attempt to argue amusing. BTW, I am still laughing at your attack on Senator Dayton. When you can not defeat the logic of a post, just attack the source.

Bet had challenged me several times a couple of nights ago to post the link the October 3, 2004 NYT articles that all of the Democrats used to establish that Condi is a liar. Bet was stupid enough to accuse me of lying and not having read the NYT artilce. Bet was goiing to read the entire article (it is a long and well written article) and prove that I was a liar. LOL I find it amusing that the article has been provided to Bet and she had not either apologize or provided her analyisi why this article does not prove that Condi is a liar. The reason for this is that Condi is a liar.

The last five Sec. of State all were approved by the Senate without any no votes. Condi got more no votes than any other Sec. of State including Kissinger and Al Haig. That is impressive.

WWTBAMFAN, I wasn't really interested in reading the article - I just wanted to see if you (or someone for you) would go to the trouble of purchasing it.

This is all so entertaining!

 

[WWTBAMFAN]

Bet

You wrongfully accused me of lying and you lied about your intentions with respect to the article. It is no wonder that you can support liars like Bush and Condi.

 

[bsnyder]

Bet

You wrongfully accused me of lying and you lied about your intentions with respect to the article. It is no wonder that you can support liars like Bush and Condi.

Nah, I think I just changed my mind since Condi was overwhelmingly confirmed and this subject is starting to bore me to tears. But it sure is fun to watch you and the major Democrat politicians in your impotent rage continue to alienate the majority of mainstream American voters with your pathetic drivel.

Carry on, please!

 

[Charade]

And I find it amusing that right wingers, you know the ones who just love to sit on their moral high horses, no longer care whether liars are in office. Even when the lies they tell actually affect their jobs.

I don't want liars in office either. What you and I consider a lie is the difference.

 

[kmiles]

Nah, I think I just changed my mind since Condi was overwhelmingly confirmed and this subject is starting to bore me to tears. But it sure is fun to watch you and the major Democrat politicians in your impotent rage continue to alienate the majority of mainstream American voters with your pathetic drivel.

Carry on, please!

Majority of mainstream American voters? Alienation? Um, where do you get your so-called facts from? The shrub won by 3 million votes out of 120 million plus, cast.

The DNC outraised the RNC in 2004.

Fewer and fewer people support US involvement in Iraq.

I'm not seeing this alienation that you're so fond of speaking about Bet.

Oh, and here's another fun fact for ya. Guess who received the largest number of votes after the shrub and Senator Kerry. I'll give you a bit of a hint: She's a well-known Senator.

 

[kmiles]

I don't want liars in office any more than you do. What you and I consider a lie is the difference.

Those who support liars often lie themselves.

 

[BuckNaked]

Majority of voters? Alienation? Um, where do you get your so-called facts from? The shrub won by 3 million votes out of 120 million plus, cast.

It doesn't matter if he had won by 3,000 instead of 3 million. It would still be a majority.

 

[kmiles]

Ah, should have been "majority of mainstream Americans" rather than "voters."

 

[Charade]

Those who support liars often lie themselves.

If you say so RM.