Jennasis
DIS life goes on
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2000
- Messages
- 35,676
And by "he should not have had a weapon", I am actually suggesting that his gun that he bought legally should have been confiscated after his animal abuse incidents and expulsion.
People found guilty of domestic abuse should have their weapons confiscated. People who have made terroristic threads should have their weapons confiscated. Your second amendment rights should stop at the point where you are a danger to others. The 1st amendment right of freedom of speech has limits. You can't threaten the life of the president, even though it's just speech. You can't incite panic. Your 2nd amendment rights should work the same way. If you are a danger to others, you don't get to own weapons.
Interesting note...years ago when I was going through a divorce, my ex threatened to shoot me. He owned MANY guns and was a gun nut. He was quite unstable and very very upset about the divorce and I felt he would follow through with his threat so I took out an order of protection. When he was served the papers for the order, they attempted to confiscate his guns but he had miraculously "sold" them all (conveniently to his brother) so there was nothing they could do. A year later I got a call from the police department informing me that he had applied for a handgun permit which they intended to approve even though I begged them not to. Their reasoning was the order had expired and since I didn't renew it I obviously felt he was no longer a threat.