Well said. The fact that RS and FP were not designed to work together has absolutely led to the loopholes that are being taken advantage of. I believe these loopholes will be closed in the very near future as it seems they are already taking steps in that direction .Yes. This would solve a few of the problems. When DAS was on a card, you could save your times for the next day. Once they moved it to the MDE/MB system ... they expire at midnight. So moving this to the system would not only keep a control of it, would enforce the expiration so front line CMs don't have to deal with it ... you would also be able to see it on your MDE and not having to keep up with the paper or worrying about passing it off. And no sharing/selling outside your MDE group.
Absolutely would not surprise me based on conversations the last year or so.
And you will have to take this into consideration when asking for one, just look at it as booking another FP+ except instead of a window of one hour you have the rest of the day. Everyone knows which rides they are going to request this on, so build in the extra time.
Think about how many they print out for the month for these. Then they have to compute these into the system without really knowing when they will be used. Those computations impact the number of FP+ offered to others via the system. Then the actual usage will impact the SB line. At this point with crowds I am okay with Disney getting control of some of their loose strings.
Us too. And that was the original point when they removed the ability at some rides to swap at the entrance/exit.
We all have to remember that when RS/CS was implemented by Disney there was no such thing as FP. EVERYONE waited in the STANDBY lines. This was implemented so a group didn't have to split up and then wait in STANDBY TWICE. That was a very fair offer to keep the "too short" ones out of the line, and not have to offer a swap location or wait room (Universal style).
Once FP started, Disney should have changed the entire program's implementation to keep it in check. They didn't. It has now likely gotten out of control, as we can read here and other places. 7DMT, Pandora ... soon enough TSL and SWL, then Tron and who knows what else.
I would not be surprised if they are now going to slowly change the program to be more in line what it originally was in anticipation of the huge use of it the next few years.
Well said. The fact that RS and FP were not designed to work together has absolutely led to the loopholes that are being taken advantage of. I believe these loopholes will be closed in the very near future as it seems they are already taking steps in that direction .
Oh I agree with you. If everyone has a FP then yes they should allow the RS. My issue, which many others share, is when not everyone has a FP. That's where the loophole comes in.I disagree. Say a family has 2 parents and 2 kids, one of whom is too short. I don’t see a problem with getting a RS pass, even if everyone has a fastpass. I don’t think it’s criminal to allow the taller child 2 rides so that both parents can experience the ride with a member of the family.
Add BTMRR to the list of same day ride swap
I actually like the change to making it a same-day pass. It seems more in the "spirit" of the policy, which is to allow a party/family to experience the ride even if they have children who are too short. I've always thought it was weird that the RS pass allows for >1 person to ride -- to me it seems like it should only allow the parent who sat out the ride with the smaller children to come back and experience it. Don't get me wrong - we were very lucky to have someone hand us one when we were standing outside FoP, but in terms of the policy itself I've always found it extremely generous and open to exploitation.
That makes sense, but then why make it for 3 people? Isn't one person still sitting alone? I guess I just feel like that number is kind of arbitrary, so especially on rides like FoP and 7DMT where the lines are soooo long, it would be more "fair" to just let the parent back on alone.They allow more than one person to ride so that there isn’t a parent stuck riding alone if there is a tall enough child in the party that could ride with them.

I disagree. Say a family has 2 parents and 2 kids, one of whom is too short. I don’t see a problem with getting a RS pass, even if everyone has a fastpass. I don’t think it’s criminal to allow the taller child 2 rides so that both parents can experience the ride with a member of the family.
Oh I agree with you. If everyone has a FP then yes they should allow the RS. My issue, which many others share, is when not everyone has a FP. That's where the loophole comes in.
That makes sense, but then why make it for 3 people? Isn't one person still sitting alone? I guess I just feel like that number is kind of arbitrary, so especially on rides like FoP and 7DMT where the lines are soooo long, it would be more "fair" to just let the parent back on alone.
But since I'm always the only parent in the park with my 2 kids I'm always looking for an excuse to get 5 minutes alone ...![]()
I understood what you meant and agree with you. RS was never intended for families to double up on fast passes, especially not to get multiple tier 1s for the same day. I hope they fix that soon.I think you misunderstood what was said. Was not saying that they should not offer the program. Saying they need to update the program to match current services.
I think it’s for multiple people so that in the case of families with multiple kids tall enough to ride, there are no fights over who rides with who. All the kids get to go twice.
(RS is actually for 4 people - the rider + 3 addt’l)
For rides like Everest, RnR and 7d, I’ve always been expecting them to cut the pass to 2 people. Makes no sense to allow 3 on a ride where only 2 can sit together no matter what. For flexible rides , I think 3 is nice as it allows larger parties some flexibility to share the experience, but if a ride vehicle sits only 2 - just allow 2.