- Joined
- Nov 15, 2008
- Messages
- 45,165
Changing the system so you can't drop days at the beginning of the reservation for some period of time isn't a big change to the system. Its a policy change that isn't any different than the change from "day by day" booking to book the whole thing at eleven months from the check in day (which they stopped not because you could get locked out mid trip, but because it was increasing their costs dramatically as people had to make a phone call for each day of their stay - I do not buy that it had anything to do with the members - it wasn't sustainable for Disney). Or giving us access to online booking (which was a pretty major change because online booking has different hours than phone booking - and that extra hour is not at all at a convenient time for West Coast members). Its much less of a change than making Fall more expensive. Or changing the point cost of studios. Or even putting the bedding for five in a studio which has decreased storage and increased room wear and tear. But hey, for people who want five in a studio, its been great.
People aren't happy with the walking situation. A lot of us don't want to waitlist (in 20+ years of ownership, I have never waitlisted, I either make the reservation I make, or I move on. I don't trust the waitlist, since we know its possible for me to get a room by stalking that you have a waitlist already in place for - it disturbs my sense of fairness and justice. They could fix that as well - again, that's a pretty simple data base change to add a room status "open" "reserved" and "released" - released rooms aren't available for booking - i.e. don't change to open - until the wait list has been run against them - but they haven't) Disney isn't likely to do anything about it. But they COULD do so and saying they can't without ruining the system isn't at all accurate - its an excuse either on behalf of Disney or on behalf of the members who like walking.
It is quite possible that the members who like the situation with walking outnumber those who are not happy, and change it would not increase member satisfaction. Personally, I would lay money on it being the case of more members would be happy with a change such as the one I proposed and the virtual end of walking (as has been pointed out, a few members with a ton of points might still choose to do it, but honestly, when it isn't necessary because so few people do it, those people aren't very likely to bother for anything other than VAKL Concierge rooms or something like that).
Just to clarify, I am indifferent to walking and don’t use it very often.
I am happy with the system that allows all modifications at any time without a penalty outside of 31 days.
So, changes that can’t be made for X days is some level of a penalty IMO.
And that is why I think changes to curb walking would have a far reaching negative impact on owners.
Obviously we all have to deal with what DVC decides, but rest assured any change that they come up with will result in some owners finding strategic ways around it yo get what they want.
Last edited: