ROFR Thread July to Sept 2023 *PLEASE SEE FIRST POST FOR INSTRUCTIONS & FORMATTING TOOL*

[TybeeEagle]

Congrats.

Curious, did you or did the seller pay for the closing costs and/or the dues for the 2023 points?

If you paid any of them you should update your string with the added costs. If the sellers paid, your could include that info too.

Got my final numbers, string should be up-to-date.

 

[Cyberc1978]

Got my final numbers, string should be up-to-date.

I see that your cost increased quite a bit.

You mentioned that you offered $35k all in?

 

[Nick_will]

Nick_will---$70-$18560-220-OKW-Oct-0/22, 241/23, 220/24, 220/25- sent 9/15

 

[TybeeEagle]

I see that your cost increased quite a bit.

You mentioned that you offered $35k all in?

Annual dues for 250 pts for '23

 

[pangyal]

Updated!

 

[Jlo85]

Jlo85---$113-$18720-160-BLT-Feb-0/22, 0/23, 5/24-Seller credits dues- sent 9/7, passed 9/16

Still not sure I formatted this correctly. I paid $120/point, but the credited dues brought it down to $113/point I guess.

 

[Cyberc1978]

Jlo85---$113-$18720-160-BLT-Feb-0/22, 0/23, 5/24-Seller credits dues- sent 9/7, passed 9/16

Still not sure I formatted this correctly. I paid $120/point, but the credited dues brought it down to $113/point I guess.

if you paid $120 then you need to modify your string to reflect that, even if the sellers paid the dues for 2023 and 2024.

 

[DoUevenDisneyBro]

DoUevenDisneyBro---$112-$15183 120-SSR-Dec-0/22, 202/23, 120/24, 120/25- sent 8/29

 

[garalex]

garalex---$106-$22840-200-AUL-Oct-0/22, 426/23, 77/24, 200/25- sent 9/15

 

[Jlo85]

if you paid $120 then you need to modify your string to reflect that, even if the sellers paid the dues for 2023 and 2024.

It wouldn’t let me. Because 120x160 is > $18,720

 

[htguy]

htguy---$250-$26499-100-VGC-Sep-0/22, 200/23, 100/24, 100/25- sent 9/7, passed 9/16

 

[TheDailyMoo]

htguy---$250-$26499-100-VGC-Sep-0/22, 200/23, 100/24, 100/25- sent 9/7, passed 9/16

I don't keep up with the California properties but this seems like a REALLY good price for a small contract and fully loaded with banked points in the current UY!

 

[AwfulWaffle]

I believe this was the one talked about yesterday over on another thread (https://www.disboards.com/threads/rofr-back.3927682/post-65049126). Sounds like it was purchased immediately above asking.

No it was a misprint, it was actually for OKW. I know because I am the one who submitted the offer to later be told it was not for AKV but was actually for OKW 2042 so I rescinded my offer.

 

[Cyberc1978]

It wouldn’t let me. Because 120x160 is > $18,720

You just create a new string or modify your previous message.

You can modify and put in $19,200, that’s assuming seller paid the closing costs. If you paid the closing then you add the cost to the $19,200 as well.

 

[Jlo85]

You just create a new string or modify your previous message.

You can modify and put in $19,200, that’s assuming seller paid the closing costs. If you paid the closing then you add the cost to the $19,200 as well.

Again, the ROFR tool threw an error when I tried to put in $120 as the price per point because it would have been higher than the total. The total is correct. I can modify the string, but the tool error makes me think it’ll mess things up with all the data analytics. In the scheme of things, doesn’t matter that much.

 

[intamin]

Again, the ROFR tool threw an error when I tried to put in $120 as the price per point because it would have been higher than the total. The total is correct. I can modify the string, but the tool error makes me think it’ll mess things up with all the data analytics. In the scheme of things, doesn’t matter that much.

I would just do it like this.

Jlo85---$120-$19500 (or however much 19200+closing cost is)-160-BLT-Feb-0/22, 0/23, 5/24-seller pays MF 23/24- sent 9/7, passed 9/16

We know you're be reimbursed for the 23/24 MF, it doesn't needed to be reflected in the price per point since it's already implied it's being paid for with the seller paying the MF in 23 and 24 even though you've already been given the cash for it which may or may not have been used to bring the price down.

People on here don't buy stripped VB contracts and then write it as 20 dollars per point, seller credits dues 23/24 lol.

 

[Blerghityblergh]

Blerghityblergh---$93-$29500-300-SSR-Dec-0/21, 0/22, 150/23, 300/24- sent 9/15

 

[Jlo85]

We know you're be reimbursed for the 23/24 MF, it doesn't needed to be reflected in the price per point since it's already implied it's being paid for with the seller paying the MF in 23 and 24 even though you've already been given the cash for it which may or may not have been used to bring the price down.

People on here don't buy stripped VB contracts and then write it as 20 dollars per point, seller credits dues 23/24 lol.

Probably too much back-and-forth, and none of it really matters. But counterpoint: I prefer the way the tool does it. It forces you to calculate a price per point based on your total cost. That is the real, final price per point. There are no implications, no hidden fees or dues costs. I would actually prefer if everyone calculated their contracts that way. Because doing it as you described somewhat obscures variation like broker fees (which at least Fidelity charges) or varying closing costs (Aulani has higher costs). Again, just my preference, but I'm going to keep it the way the tool (https://rofr.scubacat.net/told) forced me to write it. *Shrug*

 

[disneylandtour]

disneylandtour---$80-$14154-150-OKW(E)-Sep-0/22, 150/23, 150/24, 150/25- sent 8/31, passed 9/15

 

[Chili327]

Chili327---$270-$21768-75-VGC-Jun-0/22, 75/23, 75/24, 75/25- sent 9/18

Was on the verge of buying VDH direct, but then made an offer & here we are.