(just had to say it before someone else did....)
BriarfoxinWA said:Well I'm not going to rehash this whole issue all over again. My opinion, in summary is this:
Seahawks dominated the first half in spite of a clearly biased group of refs. Had they not have to play against the Steelers 12th man - in this case the refs - they probably would have won. All of the hype, the commercials only showing 3 Seattle players with the trophy versus how many Steeler players just confirms that Seattle was destined to lose no matter how good of a game they played.

who knows. Unfortunately as long as the refs are human there will be judgement calls and the replay is only as good as the person reviewing it and the angles that are shown. I just wish there was a way to change it, but what can be done? I guess if you are a fan of the team on the receiving the bad call, you just have to realize that things happen and move on. (this is really a funny statement coming from a Bills and Sabres fan....we never move on!)Nancy said:Can't really comment on the Superbowl because I didn't watch a lot of it, but I do think the quality of the officiating in the NFL has gone down the tubes in the last few years. There is a huge lack of consistancy now. Some games are called tight and some are called so they let anything short of murder go. There have always been controversial calls in regular games and playoffs, and some have really been the deciding factor. Is this one call the reason Seattle lost?who knows. Unfortunately as long as the refs are human there will be judgement calls and the replay is only as good as the person reviewing it and the angles that are shown. I just wish there was a way to change it, but what can be done?
I guess if you are a fan of the team on the receiving the bad call, you just have to realize that things happen and move on. (this is really a funny statement coming from a Bills and Sabres fan....we never move on!)
Ben was just telling the truth to a question he was asked. I admire thatLisa loves Pooh said:I don't agree with him saying it on Letterman. What was the point of that? Just b/c they always score on the 4th down. There is no way to prove they could have done so on Sunday. And he is disservicing his teammates and fellow Superbowl Champs by saying that type of thing.
We live in a society that is all to easy to beat around the bush or just entirely skirt a question that is uncomfortable to answer, for fear of what the recourse will be. I don't think it's a disservice to his teammates because after he had a chance to look at the replays, he agreed that it was a touchdown. cardaway said:pssst... has Norwood been taken out yet?

Nancy said:Nah..believe it or not we still love our Scotty! We just hate the words "wide right!"![]()
roliepolieoliefan said:Of all the comments I heard, I just think it was really classless of Mike Holgram's comment during the rally in Seattle. I thought he was a better coach and person than that. Talk about sore losers.
I can't see anyone on the Steelers making a comment like that, if the tables would have been turned, especially Bill Cowher.
OK I'm lying. Joey Porter would have said something.![]()

MICKEY88 said:if you can get a tape of the game watch it closely Seattle was guilty of holding on almost every passing play, that's the only reason the steelers didn't have more sacks..as Raiders and Browns fan, the Steelers are far from my favorite team, so I'm certainly not biased towards them
Trish5768 said:Bottom line is this: Even if you take away Ben's touchdown and they kick a field goal instead of going for it on 4th we still win by 8. If we go for it and don't make it we still win by 4.![]()

the final score was 21 to 10Trish5768 said:Bottom line is this: Even if you take away Ben's touchdown and they kick a field goal instead of going for it on 4th we still win by 8. If we go for it and don't make it we still win by 4.![]()

Alicnwondrln said:the final score was 21 to 10
take away the 7 point that ben admits he did nto score you guys have 14
add 7 to the touchdown that seattle lost int he 1st quarter cuz of the crappy offensive holding then they have 17 so they would have been winning
that doesnt mean other point would have been scored
but the steelers got a pass here and they played just as bad as seattle they got lucky and then they got all the calls
Alicnwondrln said:the final score was 21 to 10
take away the 7 point that ben admits he did nto score you guys have 14
add 7 to the touchdown that seattle lost int he 1st quarter cuz of the crappy offensive holding then they have 17 so they would have been winning
that doesnt mean other point would have been scored
but the steelers got a pass here and they played just as bad as seattle they got lucky and then they got all the calls