Originally posted by CarolA
The Marriott may charge a resort fee. However, the original poster said for transport to the parks. Is it possible the charge for both? I would not be surprised,
As I say, a year and a half can make a great difference in what's going on at a new hotel, and Oct. 01 was my last experience there. So I'd be lying if I said I know what Winter heard. If they're charging him five to ten bucks for a "transportation fee" that he can accept or decline, then the Marriott's doing it more up-front than I've seen elsewher and I applaud them.
However, from what I've seen, the "resort fee," or "transportation fee," or whatever hotels choose to call it (so as not to pick on Marriott, I think theyr'e typical), is simply an upcharge because what they have to charge for rooms is lower than their budget will allow. I think the story often changes, but in many of the cases I've seen they claim the "resort fee" to be for any amenity with which they can label it. Transportation and free-phone service are the most common, and are usually both given as reasons, meaning you're right, it's for both.
I just kinda wish they'd call a spade a spade. If I choose to stay outside the parks, as an experienced Orlando traveler I find out if there's a resort fee before I compare prices. If it's a transportation fee, then sell daily transportation tickets. If it's for unlimited local phone calls, tell me how much a day it costs for unlimited phone calls. If it's non-optional, then tag it on the cost of the room, because it's a cost of staying in that room, not a resort or transporation fee. If you're going to charge me ala carte, then I should have the right to choose said item or not.
And don't take the rant wrong, by the time I choose a hotel or resort, I'm happy to pay whatever the bottom line is. I'd just like to see a little truth-in-advertising.
Pat