In the first place, can you please give me a source where these scholars have posted their findings? (It's funny that you call me miss science, I'm an art student

)
Well, I read it in the footnotes of one of my Bibles. So, if you don't find that a credible source then that's fine.
Well seeing that there are roughly 1 -2 million named species, that boat would need room for 4 million species. Seeing as how the world was supposedly flooded, they would have to carry not only all terrestial animals (reptiles, amphibians, mammals, insects, ect....) the ark would also have to carry all freshwater fish and most birds. On top of that, the ark would also have to carry food and supplies for all these animals, which would also take up a considerable amount of space (at least half the boat).
Well, I do belive in adaptation. And there are roughly 1-2 million named species NOW. But over 2,000 years ago at the beginnining of time there may not have been that many. I don't think there were that many either. I think God knew what he was doing. That's why he gave Noah specific instructions on how to build the boat.
And there is also no evidence for a global flood (which, if it occured, would have a great deal of evidence). The flood in the bible was most likely an exaggeration of a flood in the red sea or in the surrounding area.
There's no evidence for a lot of stuff. There'd be no evidence you were living in 100 years if people didn't write stuff down or take pictures. People would just have to rely on the stories that were passed down about you.
Really? I'm not just talking languages, I mean changes within the content and rules put forth in the bible to suit the needs of whoever was using it to control the population, let alone languages. And why all the assumption that it's your bible that is 'his word'? You do realize that there are many other religions with a holy text, and there is nothing that makes the bible so special. Like most holy texts the bible is just an accumulation of older religions and mythology, as well as changes made by people to suit them and/or the veiwpoints of that time.
Yeah. The street Bible is pretty funny if you ask me. I 'assume' that my Bible is His word because of my faith. Again. It's a faith thing.
You do not understand something, so you ignore it and decide it must not be true? Thats a great way to go about things....
No. I never denounced what you've written as being not true. I've read through all of it. And understood what I could. But, I didn't do hardcore research on the words I didn't know. I just used context clues or skipped over them. And I actually agreed with some of it. Like the thing about love and etc.
An interesting side note. I love science, but I'm usually bored stiff in bio... I think it's just the format in which things are taught. The teracher makes a big difference too. Last year I had a great bio teacher, and the class was very fun and interesting. This year, my bio teacher was boring, and the difference is very noticable. Most kids fall asleep.
I love my bio class. I just dislike science.