aaarcher86
Registered
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2010
- Messages
- 11,801
Yes there was the following vicious attack: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvlzkdxad-A
This kid beat poor Pluto's **** before he attacked. Self defense!
Yes there was the following vicious attack: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvlzkdxad-A
Before I go to Magic Kingdom next time, I'm going to get my doctor to write me a script for an emotional support six pack of beer.![]()
Before I go to Magic Kingdom next time, I'm going to get my doctor to write me a script for an emotional support six pack of beer.![]()
One of the young ladies who was in my youngest DD's wheelchair dance class had a YorkiePoo as her Service Dog.Not all service dogs are seeing eye dogs. Even small Yorkies can be trained to provide a service for their owners. It just depends upon what the person with the disability needs. I personally have trained Yorkies as obedience champions so do not underestimate them or their abilities.
Cody does actually meet the definition in the ADA of a Service Dog because of all the things I bolded.One thing people need to understand though is not all ESAs are pets nor are they only used for comfort nor are all of them not highly trained. There are many ESAs that are more like service animals than just "emotional support" but since they deal with the mental more than then physical they are not labeled the same.
My 6 year old nephew Gabe is bi-polar/autistic and a few years ago, his ESA Cody came into our lives and really, that dog has been a true live saver. Cody not only provides comfort like a "pet" but he is also trained to sense Gabe's moods and where he is on the high/low scale. Gabe can go from happy, calm and bubbly to deep depression without a moment's notice, and during lows can strike out, not only against others but also into self harm. Cody can sense a breakdown and before Gabe can start lashing out, Cody is able to gently get him down, cover him and bring him to focus. It's amazing to watch. Cody is also trained to get Gabe's parents if he about to melt down when they are out of the room, to watch Gabe's actions if he starts to do things that could harm him or others and take action, and also to move between Gabe and others if Gabe were to possibly lash out at say another child. Cody is also able to help with the highs, and keeps Gabe from climbing things or running out the door ect.
Cody is considered an emotional support dog, not a service animal because he deals with a mental issue and not a physical issue, but that does not make him a pet. He is a life saver for my nephew and a necessary part of our day to day lives. To call that dog a pet, is unfair and wrong. He is a service animal just the same as one who sees or hears for others.
Duck problem?My beagle could take care of the duck problem at Disney.![]()
For something that seems very important to the original poster, You think they would of just called Disney for the answers instead of posting on a forum when they know they would get different answers. I'm just saying
if you knew anything about "calling disney" for correct information, you'd not make that suggestion. (this was covered in this very thread, early on.)
I agree with this. We were in a TX airport back in September and there was a lady waiting to board our plane with 2 dogs that she said were Emotional Support dogs. They were on leashes, but she wasn't holding them back - she was letting them go up to everybody and lick people and do whatever they wanted. I asked her how she got them certified as Emotional Support dogs and she said all she did was go to a website -I forgot what website it was - and pay about $500 and they sent her a card. She was boasting that they even have to let her take them into restaurants. I asked if she had to buy a seat for them and she said no that she was holding them in her lap. I would have been beyond angry if I had been the poor soul having to sit in the seat beside her and TWO dogs!! I totally support trained service animals, but I don't think people need to take a dog with them every where for emotional support. Sorry.
One thing people need to understand though is not all ESAs are pets nor are they only used for comfort nor are all of them not highly trained. There are many ESAs that are more like service animals than just "emotional support" but since they deal with the mental more than then physical they are not labeled the same.
My 6 year old nephew Gabe is bi-polar/autistic and a few years ago, his ESA Cody came into our lives and really, that dog has been a true live saver. Cody not only provides comfort like a "pet" but he is also trained to sense Gabe's moods and where he is on the high/low scale. Gabe can go from happy, calm and bubbly to deep depression without a moment's notice, and during lows can strike out, not only against others but also into self harm. Cody can sense a breakdown and before Gabe can start lashing out, Cody is able to gently get him down, cover him and bring him to focus. It's amazing to watch. Cody is also trained to get Gabe's parents if he about to melt down when they are out of the room, to watch Gabe's actions if he starts to do things that could harm him or others and take action, and also to move between Gabe and others if Gabe were to possibly lash out at say another child. Cody is also able to help with the highs, and keeps Gabe from climbing things or running out the door ect.
Cody is considered an emotional support dog, not a service animal because he deals with a mental issue and not a physical issue, but that does not make him a pet. He is a life saver for my nephew and a necessary part of our day to day lives. To call that dog a pet, is unfair and wrong. He is a service animal just the same as one who sees or hears for others.
Someone in my immediate family has an Emotional Support Animal. What is required from them is to be under the care of a doctor in the field & have a doctor's note stating the purpose of the dog. They have never nor would they ever attempt to go places where they cannot legally bring their dog (anywhere dogs are not allowed except plane cabins or their own complex). Without divulging any personal info, the dog has obviously had a huge benefit on their quality of life & they as well as everyone close to them are grateful that ESAs are protected to the extent they are & able to be prescribed by doctors. This dog was prescribed by the doctor; they did not seek out a doctor for the purpose of getting an ESA.
We're discussing WDW, which is in the United States. What other countries allow is irrelevant to this discussion.
If you knew anything about "calling Disney" for correct information, you'd not make that suggestion.
(This was covered in this very thread, early on.)
Hearing stories like this, I'm so pleased that our laws also include Support Dogs. Hopefully other countries follow soon because they are very much needed and should be protected as much as other Service Animals.
However there is a BIG different between a pet and a service animal.![]()
Last month while waiting for our kids and grandkids in Fantasyland we sat next to a woman who had a yorkie in a dog carrier. She volunteered that he helped her blood pressure.
You have to have laws it seems, due to the negative opinions of some others. That is very evident in this thread.
I completely agree. A service animal is highly trained and controlled by its owner and is legitimately certified for the job it does.
Just because it is a pet does not make it a service/"emotional support" animal.
Yes, that is why our laws here were changed sometime ago. ESD's are considered a Service animal so they're allowed everywhere. It's the law so there is no gray area.
I agree that simply being a pet doesn't make it an emotional support animal. There are many animals out there that are genuine Emotional Support Dogs. In Australia, ESD's (called therapy animals here in Australia) are trained. Many are dogs that started Guide Dog training but couldn't be accepted to be a Guide Dog. I just find it frustrating that people are quick to label that all ESD's are pets and it's simply people who can't stand being away from their pets. It might be true of some people but for most, it's a genuine need for the animal. Some people can't function without these animals, just like people who need a Guide Dog due to being visually impaired. Simply because it might be a disability that people can't "see" doesn't mean it's not as real.
To clarify-(bolded) is not law in the US.
You have to have laws it seems, due to the negative opinions of some others. That is very evident in this thread.