MICKEY88
<font color=purple>if you keep falling off of the
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
- Messages
- 9,465
1) Actually I did. I was clearly talking about those wanting to upgrade their gear. Generally that excludes discontinued lenses and variable aperatures. You also tried to stretch that to third part glass and I was very clearly talking about OEM glass.
2) You mean like the way you totally distorted my OP and tried to suggest I was stating some thing that was clearly not the case? I haven't altered the "meaning" of any thing you posted. I don't see how any of that helps your stance much. Clearly every one can read your entire post if they want to wade through all of that.
I don't suggest any one buy any brand based on rumors of future lenses or brand expansion. We have been hearing that from some brands for several years and still no joy.
I never suggested that you are "losing" any thing by using an 80-200. You seem to have great difficulty comprehending my posts. In point of fact I explicitly stated that an 80-200 is in the same category.
Finally I have no idea what ....... means.
In either event I trust that every one can clearly see there is more than one way to approach the choice of a new camera. I say handle the camera, consider the cost of future glass, the availability of future glass as well as the on line support that may be available for each brand.
1. it may exclude those things to you, and although you may have been thinking that, it was not stated,, I know many photographers that would love to upgrade with quality discontinued lenses...
2. I did not distort anything, I simply interpreted it differently, and I admitted that so why revisit that issue..
not until your last post did you concede that the 80-200 2.8 is comparable..
since you've chosen to question my comprehension skills , which I believ is a personal attack and clearly against board rules.. I have noithing more to say ..


