sheridac
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2005
- Messages
- 4,150
Last edited by sleepydog25 : Today at 08:07 AM. Reason: . . .which is okay if it's not a nightmare. . .
Are you calling me a nightmare?????
Last edited by sleepydog25 : Today at 08:07 AM. Reason: . . .which is okay if it's not a nightmare. . .
We are more than fair weather friends.....
Hope the shoe and makeup shopping was good.
And the kids are adorable!!!!
Although I hope we are all around for a long time, I would never want to think that my affections went unexpressed or, worse, unrealized. To family OR friends. And that includes all you crazy people. That's why LY/MI will NEVER be played in my book. Cause when I say it, I generally mean it!!!!
Last edited by Grammyof2 : Today at 08:29 AM. Reason: Sheri - will you make me an Angel Food cake???


loubon said:Fifth, I'm in WDW and you're not.
And to you. . .forgot to mention earlier that the pic of you and kimmie was great. . .nice to put pics to faces. . .for a relative newbie like me. . .AshClan said:On to other things:
I TOLD you guys that Kimmie's kids were adorable, didn't I? Great pics, Kim.
YAJ, love the photo. I, too, am partial to curls, though, like Kim, it may be due to my painfully fine, straight hair. I have curl envy. I admit it. I would def. keep the siggie, though. It's nice to see the two styles in the two signatures.
Pongo! Did you get your makeup? I am heading to training at 10. Will prob. be around later this afternoon/tonight.
OH, and BTW, I have officially re-subscribed to TGM. Love the "best days" stuff. It's very time consuming to read through all of that, though!!!
Hi Grammy, hi Amy, hi Steph, hi SD! I'll echo....where are the Poops and Tink???

sleepydog25 said:And to you. . .forgot to mention earlier that the pic of you and kimmie was great. . .nice to put pics to faces. . .for a relative newbie like me. . .
GADISNEYGIRL said:WE don't act that way when WE are at the World, do we?? No, we call and share the joy with our friends!!!

Thirdly, the toussled hair looks hot. On both of you. I'm just saying. And I didn't even notice the sunglasses.
Smooches heading your way, even if you ARE at WDW and I'm not. After doing much research, I decided upon the Panasonic DMC-LZ2--lightweight, superb features, great pics, good predicted reliability, and it can use nearly any style battery from lithium, to rechargeable, to standard. And it doesn't cost an arm and a leg.
Sure Grammy! I didn't want to have to put a big red X over my head for you to recognize me at the meet. And they ARE, aren't they??Thanks Kimmie!!!! You are both Maelstrom cuties And the kids are adorable!!!!
Too true, Sher. Sid,There is no making sense of these things sweetie. Don't try. You'll make yourself crazy.
None of us have that much time here on this earth, really.
to you.kpk89 said:Is it wrong that I am too lazy to do my own exhaustive research, and will likely just take the word of my internet friends? Though so far, D, you and your Panasonic are outnumbered 4-1 here on M2.
Darn! You noticed. Umm, let's just say my skills don't match my superyduperysecretagent status. I'm working on it, though. . .AshClan said:Thanks, Dawg. There's a better, more flattering pic of me and DH earlier in the thread. Pg 113, I believe. Just sadin'............And MOST of the TR peeps have pics in their TRs. Now, where's your picture? Huh? Don't remember any secret agent photos in YOUR TR!!!
Most Canons get high marks all around, but their cost is usually more than Panasonics. Given my relatively crappy skills, I couldn't see dropping extra dough on a more expensive model. Plus, mine has the image stabilizer ability; not sure if the comparable Canon does. However, a decently priced Canon with image stabilizer, good zoom capability, and the ability to use cheaper batteries in a pinch would be a good choice I'm thinkin'.kpk89 said:Is it wrong that I am too lazy to do my own exhaustive research, and will likely just take the word of my internet friends? Though so far, D, you and your Panasonic are outnumbered 4-1 here on M2.