Robinrs
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Sep 7, 1999
- Messages
- 38,423
Yes I am saying that.
And you're TEACHING children? Looks like you could use some schooling yourself.
Gotta be a troll...

Yes I am saying that.
i would hope suspension.
when i was taking a few college courses a few years ago, there was a grown adult woman who made a racial slur to another grown adult woman, and NOTHING got done about it, except a statement was made. i couldn't believe it!!
I homeschool, but I would hope absolutely none.
Yes I am saying that.
Ok, I am probably poking the troll but...
Everyone is entitled to an opinion. So, why do you feel there should be no punishment for one student using a racial slur against another student in school?
Good luck getting a straight answer.![]()
And you're TEACHING children? Looks like you could use some schooling yourself.
Gotta be a troll...![]()
ExactlyIf a teacher heard a student call another student the n word, she should just ignore it?
Exactly
The OP asked:Can I ask your reasoning why no repercussions of harsh words?
The OP did not ask what would the punishment be at home and as such I answered her question the way I feel in this situation. I am going to assume this is a public school and as such a representative of the state. The first amendment is pretty clear and I paraphrasewhat would the punishment be at your school?
Most legal scholars would agree this definition is used to mean: To cut short; curtail. As described by the OP, this is 1 student to 1 student. This is NOT a case of yelling FIRE in a crowded auditorium.Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech...
The OP asked: The OP did not ask what would the punishment be at home and as such I answered her question the way I feel in this situation. I am going to assume this is a public school and as such a representative of the state. The first amendment is pretty clear and I paraphrase
Most legal scholars would agree this definition is used to mean: To cut short; curtail. As described by the OP, this is 1 student to 1 student. This is NOT a case of yelling FIRE in a crowded auditorium.
I think for the state or a representative of the state to punish speech or a phrase or a harsh word no matter how much one may or may not be offended by that speech is dangerous and should never be allowed or encouraged.
I think a person that calls another a name is small and weak and they seek power. I think the best course of action is to ignore that speech or phrase I or others may find offensive thereby not giving the person who used it the attention and power they so seek.
Personally I ignore everyone who refers to me as a troll. I am pretty offended by it, but I don't acknowledge or answer those who do. Same thing to me.
So yes I stand by my original statement, I would hope the school would be intelligent about this issue and did nothing in the situation as described by the OP.
The OP asked: The OP did not ask what would the punishment be at home and as such I answered her question the way I feel in this situation. I am going to assume this is a public school and as such a representative of the state. The first amendment is pretty clear and I paraphrase
Most legal scholars would agree this definition is used to mean: To cut short; curtail. As described by the OP, this is 1 student to 1 student. This is NOT a case of yelling FIRE in a crowded auditorium.
I think for the state or a representative of the state to punish speech or a phrase or a harsh word no matter how much one may or may not be offended by that speech is dangerous and should never be allowed or encouraged.
I think a person that calls another a name is small and weak and they seek power. I think the best course of action is to ignore that speech or phrase I or others may find offensive thereby not giving the person who used it the attention and power they so seek.
Personally I ignore everyone who refers to me as a troll. I am pretty offended by it, but I don't acknowledge or answer those who do. Same thing to me.
So yes I stand by my original statement, I would hope the school would be intelligent about this issue and did nothing in the situation as described by the OP.
In 2002, Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County, et al. v. Earls et al., 122 S.Ct. 2559 the SC did issue a legal opinion that includedIt's been pretty clearly decided by the Supreme Court that certain Constitutional rights do not apply to minors in school.
Securing order in the school environment sometimes requires that students be subjected to greater controls than those appropriate for adults. Without first establishing discipline and maintain order, teachers cannot begin to educate their students. And apart from education, the school has an obligation to protect pupils from mistreatment by other children, and also to protect teachers themselves from violence by a few students whose conduct in recent years has prompted national concern.
Sorry, but I do not respond to what if situations that have nothing to do with what the OP wrote. In the case as described by the OP, I think the best course of action is to do absolutely nothing and certainly not punish someone for the action described by the OP.Does your feeling apply to all speech? So, if I'm giving a test and a student starts reading the answers outloud for other children to copy -- should that be protected? If I'm teaching a lesson on fractions and another child starts singing at the top of their lungs -- is that protected speech? If a child comes to school and threatens another child with physical violence -- is that protected speech?
And you're TEACHING children? Looks like you could use some schooling yourself.
Gotta be a troll...![]()