Pam OKW wrote: ncligs was just pointing out that some members, as hard as it is for some to believe, really do like the OKW pools just as they are..
I don't think anyone on this thread has disputed that some OKW members like the pools as they are- there was a question as to whether it was many or most but even the very angry threads calling for an end to poolhopping for OKW members only, never said that nobody liked the pools as they are...but those who do like them must admit that many people who stay at OKW do not like the pools as they are.
Pam wrote: The purpose of the pool is to provide a place to swim and relax. Suggestions were made that there are other places to find excitement and a water park atmosphere at WDW.
Again- suggesting people go elsewhere on property misses the point...it is not about water parks-For that matter, even SAB is no comparison to a real water park- it's a large, nice interactive pool...(I have never felt like some say that it is like a miniwater park)..
it's about offering similar choices--BWV, VWL, BCV- all offer people a choice AT the resort. OKW does not offer any choice at the resort... I think some of the tension is created by this asymmetry-
Pam wrote:The complaints sort of remind me of people who buy condos next to the firehouse and then lobby to get them to stop blowing the fire whistle. You knew, or had an opportunity to know, what the facilities were like at OKW before purchasing. Anything that was vitally important to your enjoyment should have been considered. Trying to force the resort to change now is unrealistic....
No argument- those who own there should be satisfied with things as they are and no one should be trying to force anything. That does not mean they should never try to change anything if they feel it can be better.
Pam wrote: I question again whether adding a slide would solve the problem. Heck, if it's a slide you want, there is no need to pool hop to SAB. You can go next door to POR (when it re-opens) or around the corner to CBR. I prefer BOTH larger OKW pools to either of these.
Misses the point- it is not about slides. I made several suggestions and Pam herself made an excellent suggestion of the pirate boat that had nothing to do with slides...hopping to CBR, POR or SAB is nothing like having a choice at the resort at which you are staying...again OKW is unique in that does not offer a choice.
Earlier Pam also wrote:I agree a waterfall would look pretty but does that satisfy UncleRomulus's desire for more action?
UncleRomulus wrote in a post BEFORE that question was posed by Pam-Paul:
Good points about OKW pool!!
As I said-it does have water. But Mrs. Uncleromulus just reminded me it is pretty shallow water.
Couldn't they just spring for an elephant to squirt water over my head?? (Like the one at Luna Park, where I often pool hop to swim). The dolphins might be altered to do that. At least they'd be doing SOMETHING!!
So there are people who like OKW pools as they are and those who do not- and we don't really know the proportions of either... it's not about slides or quiet or satisfaction--the questions are of CHANGE and CHOICE. I thought the posts about limiting OKW members hopping priveleges were out of line...saying members were too cheap to pay to bring their pools up to the rest of WDW resort standards...but what is the objection to the nonslide suggestions here, if not money?- I have yet to see an argument why members would not want to do anything to enhance the pool experience? If you like it the way it is, fine but why can't kids play with the dolphin fountain? How would that or any of the non slide suggestions ruin the pool for those like Pam and ncligs who are satisfied now?
Paul