http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,579551,00.html
I actually read about this on a site that had nothing to do with consumer safety, it was instead a slam on the fad itself:
http://market-ticker.org/archives/1701-The-Requisite-Poison-Toy-Scare.html
And this is the story.... why?
Let's play this one straight up the middle, ok?
A pet is a living thing. It breathes, it eats, it sleeps and it craps. You take care of it - thus, the term "pet" - because in the environment you keep it (whether in a house, in a cage, in an aquarium, etc) if you don't, it dies.
No, I'm not going to bag on Cepia, the creator of the latest piece of idiocy to hit our store shelves as a means of turning our children into "consumers" and "plastic chinese crap junkies."
Rather I'm going to bag on we the adults - the parents.
Exactly when was it that we all decided to blow off the concept of teaching our children responsibility by acquiring an actual pet? When did we decide that it was ok to call a piece of plastic trash out of China a "pet", even though it is inanimate and requires nothing from us?
I think those are the better questions - not whether there is some violation of a rule regarding the level of a toxic agent in the toy itself.
After all, isn't the real issue here poisoning your kids' minds and turning them into vapid consumers of trash, rather than sending them outside to build things with their hands and employ their imagination?
I think so.
I actually read about this on a site that had nothing to do with consumer safety, it was instead a slam on the fad itself:
http://market-ticker.org/archives/1701-The-Requisite-Poison-Toy-Scare.html
And this is the story.... why?
Let's play this one straight up the middle, ok?
A pet is a living thing. It breathes, it eats, it sleeps and it craps. You take care of it - thus, the term "pet" - because in the environment you keep it (whether in a house, in a cage, in an aquarium, etc) if you don't, it dies.
No, I'm not going to bag on Cepia, the creator of the latest piece of idiocy to hit our store shelves as a means of turning our children into "consumers" and "plastic chinese crap junkies."
Rather I'm going to bag on we the adults - the parents.
Exactly when was it that we all decided to blow off the concept of teaching our children responsibility by acquiring an actual pet? When did we decide that it was ok to call a piece of plastic trash out of China a "pet", even though it is inanimate and requires nothing from us?
I think those are the better questions - not whether there is some violation of a rule regarding the level of a toxic agent in the toy itself.
After all, isn't the real issue here poisoning your kids' minds and turning them into vapid consumers of trash, rather than sending them outside to build things with their hands and employ their imagination?
I think so.