CarolA said:
I keep reading about "downsizing" the house or apartment.
That advice really needs to be weighed against any increased costs or out of pocket cost prior to taking it.
For example, if you move you have to pay reconnection fees on electricty, water, phone etc... You may have to pay movers or at a minimum rent a truck and bribe your buddies with Pizza/Beer. You may have to pay a deposit at the new location prior to getting your deposit back on your current rental. If your interest rate is low and your credit has gone to pot, new house payments may be higher if you have to pay more interest even if the mortgage amount is lower.
Just things to consider. If you are in a cash flow cruch, moving may not be a good option.
I agree that down-sizing should be done only as a last resort and after weighing all options and consequences.
Make sure you qualify for another smaller house or even a rental. Wil you qualify for an mortgage?
I am a residential property manager in the suburbs of NYC. I live in the building and am EXTREMELY strict in screening prospective tenants. We run all 3 credit reports along with a housing court record check. We need proof of income as well as current rent payment history.
If there are ANY housing court cases on record - automatic rejection, don't care why. If there are any collections, judgments, bankrupcies, or even delinquencies - rejection. In this case, NO credit is better than bad credit.
Over the years, there have been a few exceptions due to extenuating circumstances, but VERY few and aways well documented with why an application was approved. For example, we once approved a tenant who was divorced over 5 years ago when her credit report was horrible. She was able to provide proof through divorce and court papers that the bad debt was entirely her ex-husband's. What tipped the scales in her favor was that since the divorce 5 years ago, her credit report was as perfect as any I've seen and she submitted cancelled rent checks for the last 5 years since her divorce that proved she paid her rent on time. She lived in our building over 5 years and was one of our best tenants.
We made a decision to have ultra strict standards because NYC housing laws favor the tenants to such the degree that many unscruplous people do take advantage of the system. It takes FOREVER (read years) to get rid of a deadbeat tenant. Trust me, I have personal horror stories.
Not every non-paying tenant is taking advantage of the system. I have had tenants get laid off, etc. As long as they are honest with me and try to catch up or at least maintain the current rent, I am a sucker for a sob story and am more than willing to give them time to get their lives together. My boss calls me a big softie. (She's one to talk - she lets an elderly women who has mental problems live rent free - she stopped paying rent 5 YEARS ago when she lost her job and her mental disease got worse - apparently SHE owns the building and WE owe her money!

My boss considers this tenant part of her Christian charity. )
Anyways, it's the non-paying tenants who take car service everywhere (when the train is a block away), who have the $95 monthly premium cable, and the a/c blasting all day even when it's only 70 degrees outside that get me mad. I had one tenant who had the nerve to tell me that "oh, I don't pay my own utilities, city public aid pays it!" Argh!
However, when you have strict standards, they have to be applied to everyone from the person who you suspect will skip out on the rent to the people who you feel just got a bad break and are trying to get back on track. If both applicants have so-so credit, I can't rent to the latter just because I like them better. I have to reject them both.
Not every landlord or property manager will or can be so strict. We can afford to be so strict because I manage a fairly large building that can afford to have a few vacancies for quite a few months before any danger of being in the red. Many smaller buildings can not afford to do this, so they are more likely to "take a chance." However, many properties in the better neighborhoods and areas do tend to be stricter so it definitely limits the choices that people with bad or over-extended credit will have.
As to downsizing rental apartments, make sure you price out the market before you tell your landlord to terminate your lease. Most of my tenants in our 2 bedroom apartments have lived here for many, many years - some longer than me. This is a rent stabilized building in NYC where the rent increases during lease renewals are set (capped) by the city every year. Depending on how long they they have lived with us, their personal situation, and what type of tenant they are, I do tend to let existing tenants renew at preferential rents that are even lower than the rent increases allowed by the city (typically 2% - 7%). Therefore, at the moment, all my 2 bedroom tenants are actually paying LESS rent than the market rent for one of vacant and available 1 bedrooms in our building as well as elsewhere in the neighborhood.
So, it this case, downsizing apartments would not save any money and even if it did, it would be so small, it wouldn't justify the expense of moving or of the loss of space.
Sorry to ramble. But bottom line, downsizing maybe harder than it sounds and is not for everyone. Make sure it works for you before you try to do it. Although, I said earlier that downsizing your house/apartment is a last resort, if you know you are eventually headed in that direction, DO IT EARLY while you still can while your credit is still decent. Once your credit is messed up, it may be much, much harder for you to get a new loan or apartment at a time when you most need it.