HopperFan
"It's a bug-eat-bug world out there, princess."
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2003
- Messages
- 27,844
Every school/district will be different in how they handle things so I am not surprised at the procedural differences. Some (like ours) avoid situations that could get very litigious. I think we all have to make decisions based on what we feel is best for our child's safety. As I said, if this was allowed in our district, my child would stay home. At this point in time our district doesn't even let parents go on field trips at all. Having experienced a bad situation and heard other stories ... I think this is best.
I hate that folks are jumping on OP and making assumptions about parenting.
I was HIGHLY involved in PTA for ten years then shifted to HIGHLY involved with the HS athletics booster association for next eight years. Neither of these really had anything to do with the classroom. I RARELY ever worked on a project where I was in proximity to the parents of the children my child was in class with, and you figure each year the class changed. I worked in library for 6 years, saw lots of kids, no parents. Went to PTA meetings - all at night because there was no space during day; meeting began and as soon as over everyone left. But with hundreds of adults in room how was I to know who they were in relation to kids anyway? When I was in the classroom there were no other parents, we each had different days so we didn't overwhelm the classroom.
Elementary 800 students, Middle School 1400 students, High School 2200 students. And these were not direct feeders so each level they made new friends. My kids rode school bus that picked up in the neighborhood. My kids went to school all day, a few extra curricular activities after school, sports on Saturday and Sundays were family day. I knew the parents on their sports teams but the kids went to lots of different schools so difficult to meet up. My kids tended to play or hang with the kids on the street and of course I knew those parents, but they were all different ages and classrooms.
My kids did not go to many birthday parties. They were invited but I wasn't going to set aside a huge chunk of change for presents for kids they likely wouldn't see after that year. I also was not comfortable with in home parties with strangers. They knew they could go to two parties each year so pick wisely. They never had friend parties until 5th grade (they did have extended family parties). DS had a huge party, DD decided she'd rather have the money to go shopping. They each had a handful of good friends and that didn't happen until middle and high school, I knew the parents but there wasn't the concerns there was when they were smaller.
My kids are very social, very rounded and outgoing. No harm done by less birthday parties and sleepovers. They had very full and active childhoods with cousins, neighbors, team mates during sports time, class mates while at school and a small circle of good friends.
I agree that as long as the trip is school sanctioned during school hours then the school will be fully liable for anything that might go wrong. It is the school that arranged the parent transportation, picked the drivers and their cars and made the decision to not do anything proactive to protect the children. They will have the deepest pockets and be the first one on a lawsuit in the event of an accident. I think they are trying to blow smoke.
BUT if a school owns no school buses then they should be arranging for coach buses with professional drivers, fully insured and the children will be together in groups with the teachers, not away from their teachers with random parents. In our district even on buses there must be a certified teacher, and that doesn't count the assistant teachers or para-pros.
The legal responsibility of schools and associated groups is wide and seems this district needs to go back to school and learn. Our sports teams often had parents hosting big dinners for the athletes prior to competitions. For our cross country team, a parent would offer their home and other parents would provide all the food for the team to gather for pasta parties. A minor issued happened with a sport so the school/district lawyers did their due process and legal investigation into responsibility ................ uh oh. Private home, food provided by parents, kids transported themselves, after school hours. Seems like a regular party right? Because it was only the team, because the parents were part of the team's booster club, because it was happening because it was a high school team ..... not only were those parents legally responsible, so was the Athletic Booster Club and the School. And because the school had relinquished control to an off property site it was even worse. The events were all cancelled. We were able to bring ours back by hosting it at school after our Friday practice with coaches there. Point is .... school responsibility is far reaching.
I hate that folks are jumping on OP and making assumptions about parenting.
I was HIGHLY involved in PTA for ten years then shifted to HIGHLY involved with the HS athletics booster association for next eight years. Neither of these really had anything to do with the classroom. I RARELY ever worked on a project where I was in proximity to the parents of the children my child was in class with, and you figure each year the class changed. I worked in library for 6 years, saw lots of kids, no parents. Went to PTA meetings - all at night because there was no space during day; meeting began and as soon as over everyone left. But with hundreds of adults in room how was I to know who they were in relation to kids anyway? When I was in the classroom there were no other parents, we each had different days so we didn't overwhelm the classroom.
Elementary 800 students, Middle School 1400 students, High School 2200 students. And these were not direct feeders so each level they made new friends. My kids rode school bus that picked up in the neighborhood. My kids went to school all day, a few extra curricular activities after school, sports on Saturday and Sundays were family day. I knew the parents on their sports teams but the kids went to lots of different schools so difficult to meet up. My kids tended to play or hang with the kids on the street and of course I knew those parents, but they were all different ages and classrooms.
My kids did not go to many birthday parties. They were invited but I wasn't going to set aside a huge chunk of change for presents for kids they likely wouldn't see after that year. I also was not comfortable with in home parties with strangers. They knew they could go to two parties each year so pick wisely. They never had friend parties until 5th grade (they did have extended family parties). DS had a huge party, DD decided she'd rather have the money to go shopping. They each had a handful of good friends and that didn't happen until middle and high school, I knew the parents but there wasn't the concerns there was when they were smaller.
My kids are very social, very rounded and outgoing. No harm done by less birthday parties and sleepovers. They had very full and active childhoods with cousins, neighbors, team mates during sports time, class mates while at school and a small circle of good friends.
I think the school district's legal team is wrong. They are doing nothing to screen the parent drivers for driving record or criminal backgrounds. They are responsible for the safety of the students and likely won't avoid liability if a parent drives and there is an incident. As long as a school district is busing kids to school, they should bus them to field trips. If they don't bus the kids to school, they should screen all parent volunteers to make sure they are properly licensed and insured and have no driving or criminal violations. I also think parents should know exactly who is driving their kids in advance of the event so they can make other arrangements if they have a problem with that person for any reason.
I agree that as long as the trip is school sanctioned during school hours then the school will be fully liable for anything that might go wrong. It is the school that arranged the parent transportation, picked the drivers and their cars and made the decision to not do anything proactive to protect the children. They will have the deepest pockets and be the first one on a lawsuit in the event of an accident. I think they are trying to blow smoke.
BUT if a school owns no school buses then they should be arranging for coach buses with professional drivers, fully insured and the children will be together in groups with the teachers, not away from their teachers with random parents. In our district even on buses there must be a certified teacher, and that doesn't count the assistant teachers or para-pros.
The legal responsibility of schools and associated groups is wide and seems this district needs to go back to school and learn. Our sports teams often had parents hosting big dinners for the athletes prior to competitions. For our cross country team, a parent would offer their home and other parents would provide all the food for the team to gather for pasta parties. A minor issued happened with a sport so the school/district lawyers did their due process and legal investigation into responsibility ................ uh oh. Private home, food provided by parents, kids transported themselves, after school hours. Seems like a regular party right? Because it was only the team, because the parents were part of the team's booster club, because it was happening because it was a high school team ..... not only were those parents legally responsible, so was the Athletic Booster Club and the School. And because the school had relinquished control to an off property site it was even worse. The events were all cancelled. We were able to bring ours back by hosting it at school after our Friday practice with coaches there. Point is .... school responsibility is far reaching.