This is why I think the OP is wrong... his story has changed, yet again.
First his wife was leaving the store at 7:45, therefore, he wouldn't be leaving the gates until almost 8.
In his recent post, he was on the monorail at 7:45.
First post: had a pastry and sat outside. (clearly in no hurry to get out at this point). Then his wife tried to buy postcards (and was denied and finally found a non-staffed entrance to go in).
Recent post: had a snack while she waited in line.
He has been to a hard ticketed event in the past, but yet didn't know he was expected to leave immediately when the park closed to non-wristbanded guests.
He claims they didn't know about the party, but from others who were there, it was painfully obvious.
there are more inconsistencies...
So - given that we know the OP has already changed his story, why would I believe him that the CM was 'rude' and 'uncultured' ? It sounds like she was doing her job. Maybe a bit forcefully, but since we weren't there, maybe we should give her the benefit of the doubt. Given his twisting of the story, I'm not sure we can give him the benefit of the doubt. Personally, I think he was annoyed - read his tone. How do we know he didn't use that same attitude with the CM and then blamed her for being rude ? (yes, CM's can be rude, but for the most part...)
Whether or not you agree with the rules, what he did was against the rules and he was called on it. deal.
If you factor in asking the CM at Buzz at 6:58 if it was OK to ride then the latest time line really doesn't add up. My guess is the first one is more accurate.