Disney Enthusiast
<font color=purple>This I command...you are forbid
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2003
- Messages
- 1,463
Originally posted by auntpolly
And yet that depends, still on the age, the maturity level, the situation etc.
To tell you 17 year old she has to be home from a date by 11:00 is your call -- we all make curfews that we feel comfortable with as parents. But if there's a concert that won't be over until after 11:00, or if for some other reason a daughter that has held up her end of the bargain and obeyed your rules asks for an exception, I think you have to give it serious thought. I think that some truly overprotective parents just don't have any respect for their kids and their kids might not have any in return for them.
I must say I agree w/ what you have said. But the child must earn that privilege as you said by showing he/she respects the rules of the house etc. and by having a good track record. And at 17, one must really begin to give the child more leeway since he/she will probably be on his/her own in the near future at college, and the parent will have little control there.
I followed my parents' guidelines at college. I would go to the frat parties, but I wouldn't drink, and I would call an escort service to walk me home. I would stay out late, but I was picking up my roommates at the bars. I wouldn't drink so as not to put myself in a position where I could not defend myself against an attack. But I was following the guidelines my parents set up for me originally. I respected myself and my parents and followed what I had been taught over the years. And I tried to never leave myself susceptible to something I would regret later. And that came from their teachings.
I just in my heart don't believe a parent should condone drugging and partying at an early age in order to toughen them up for later. I don't think the child learns how to cope, but instead learns how to do anything they want, whenever they want. In this day and age I see so little of people taking responsiblity for themselves and their own actions. I feel my parents' rules and guidelines really set me up to take responsibility for my own actions and to do the right things. Kids do really well w/ discipline, they thrive on it. And they look to their parents for guidance. With no guidance or rules, I believe a child becomes very wild, just as they would w/ over protection.
So going back to what you mentioned, yes I think it does depend on the child. And I think a parent can let go on some rules as the child shows intent on following and respecting the rules you set forth. But it depends on the child and the situation as you said. I was just trying to show that some over protected kids do thrive in this environment.