Our Childrens' Futures?

Toad_Passenger

Wild Ride Dreamer
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
3,014
Read a very depressing article about things that are expected to become obsolete for children born in 2011.

Things Babies Born in 2011 Will Never Know

Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but I thought the article was very lazy, and that a lot of those things are still going to be around for a long time. I think the loss of a lot of the things on that list will actually have a negative impact on our children. Technology can be great, but at some point you being to think that the people in the movie WALL-E may not be so fantastical. :scared1:
 
Interesting list.
However, there is always old movies and shows that will support the existance and knowledge of most of the items on the list, so I don't think the knowledge of them will be erased, just the usage perhaps.

We still have a dial telephone we use at our house, we still have a VCR and many tapes, we still have a cassette player, we still have a record player, we still have a set of encyclopedias... These are pretty much looked at as obsolete now, but are still in use and may still be in the future.
 
Of all the things I worry about in our children's future, them not being able to find a travel agent to plan their honeymoon (one of the things in the article) doesn't make the list...:confused3
I didn't really find the article depressing....I mean, I grew up with a watch so I never told time with a sundial...we had a home phone but we never had a party line or one of those phones where you turn the crank..:lmao:...most of the things on the list are technological advances.

My oldest is in her twenties, we never had a set of encyclopedias (it was on CD-ROM then!) and she always had a vcr/tapes....the technology for these things has just improved.
 
Read a very depressing article about things that are expected to become obsolete for children born in 2011.

Things Babies Born in 2011 Will Never Know

Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but I thought the article was very lazy, and that a lot of those things are still going to be around for a long time. I think the loss of a lot of the things on that list will actually have a negative impact on our children. Technology can be great, but at some point you being to think that the people in the movie WALL-E may not be so fantastical. :scared1:

100% Wireless is coming, that you bet on. The big corporations are warring over the wireless market in the public and government as we speak.

I think of it in terms of "Minority Report" and not "Wall-E".

Yes, probably in the not so distant future, you will be able to track whoever you want whenever you want.

While that is creepy and big brother, there are also good things with it regarding safety, crimes, health, etc.

I don't find it "sad" it is just the progression of life. I certainly would not want to go back in the past and live, forget that.

You can move my cheese all the time and I will go find it. That is my nature. I find progression forward EXCITING and I want it to hurry up. It is moving to slow for me........:lmao:
 
Go Ad-Free on DISboards
No Google ads. Support the community.
$4.99/month
$49.95/year
Go Ad-Free →

Read a very depressing article about things that are expected to become obsolete for children born in 2011.

Things Babies Born in 2011 Will Never Know

Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but I thought the article was very lazy, and that a lot of those things are still going to be around for a long time. I think the loss of a lot of the things on that list will actually have a negative impact on our children. Technology can be great, but at some point you being to think that the people in the movie WALL-E may not be so fantastical. :scared1:

There isn't one thing on that list that surprises me at all. Most of them are already on their way out, with some being nearly obsolete (video stores).

Advancements in technology change things. Sometimes for the better, sometimes not, but I can tell you that I'm glad I don't have to crank my car each morning or wait for the ice man to come and deliver the ice for my refrigerator each morning like my grandparents had to do.
 
My brother shared that list with me today. It was a it depressing. I kept thinking of the movie Grownups where Adam Sandler kept making his kids play outside.
 
A few years ago my DD was watching Nick at Night and they played an old commercial that said something to the effect of "Don't turn that dial, we'll be right back!" DD looked at me and said "What dial"? I began to explain how TVs used to have dials for channel changing, volume adjustment, etc. Her next question was "But Mom, we have like 700 channels?" :rotfl: I then explained that we only had 7 and some UHF channels. The horrified look on her face was priceless. :rotfl2: Then she followed up with "You mean every time you wanted to change the channel or adjust the volume you had to get up out of your chair?" :laughing: It was quite the enlighting conversation for both of us.
 
The only one I care about on that list is books. I don't want to buy a Nook or Kindle at all; I need to hold my paper book and turn the pages.
 
Big deal....it's all progress. There's lots of things our grandparents grew up with that we don't know: victrolas, horse and buggies, party line phones with operators, wringer washing machines, telegraphs, pony express, butter churns, oil lamps....I could go on and on. Are we missing out because we didn't shovel coal into the coal furnace? Are we deprived because we didn't have to use leeches to cleanse us from disease? These kinds of lists are just silly.
 
I wish the commercials would hurry up and be obsolete. :thumbsup2
 
My dh is a teacher and very few of his sixth grade students can tell time on the analog clock in his classroom. They also don't understand "a quarter until..." or "half past" in reference to time. Sad.

I will likely wear an analog Disney watch of some sort forever. :) I love my Disney watches!

I think newspapers will be a thing of the past quicker than books will be, but it probably is coming (not in my lifetime--maybe not in my kid's lifetime) that all new books will go to digital format instead of paper. I love books! I don't have a Kindle yet, but will probably eventually buy one. However, we are bookaholics here (multiple loaded bookcases at home, at least 2 trips to the library each week, etc.) and I just like books in general.
 
The only one I care about on that list is books. I don't want to buy a Nook or Kindle at all; I need to hold my paper book and turn the pages.

And that is why I think the article is just plain lazy. It completely fails to acknowledge the role that these "obsolete" artifacts have played, or the fact that there are still huge groups of people who use these items.

Travel agents? A quick look through these boards will tell you that they are far from being extinct.

Watches? I think it's obvious they will never be gone.

Paper maps? Again, very hasty to assume that everyone has the technology to not get lost, and need a quick look at a map from the gas station.

Evening news? Laughable, seeing as our local news has just added another 30 minutes to the evening lineup.

Catalogs? There are a lot of times I find that companies have items in their catalog that are not found online (and vice versa).

Fax Machines? Again, plenty of workplaces still use the fax machine for a lot of things.

One digital photo frame vs. a wall of photos? Seriously? Are we becoming so enamored with efficiency that people would rather not decorate with the faces of their friends and family?

Again, the fault I find with the article is just that it comes off as very lazy and unprofessional. The author clearly wanted to give off an "our technology will be cooler than yours" type of vibe.
 
A few years ago my DD was watching Nick at Night and they played an old commercial that said something to the effect of "Don't turn that dial, we'll be right back!" DD looked at me and said "What dial"? I began to explain how TVs used to have dials for channel changing, volume adjustment, etc. Her next question was "But Mom, we have like 700 channels?" :rotfl: I then explained that we only had 7 and some UHF channels. The horrified look on her face was priceless. :rotfl2: Then she followed up with "You mean every time you wanted to change the channel or adjust the volume you had to get up out of your chair?" :laughing: It was quite the enlighting conversation for both of us.

We've had similar conversations with our kids.
"When we were your age we only had 5 channels, and at midnight all shows went off the air, after they played the National Anthem".

That, and the remote control talk---"yes, we actually had to get up to change the channel".

I sound like my mother--- "when I was your age we didn't have......", or "when I was your age we had (or had to..).....".

My DD saw an old fashioned 33mm camera once and asked me what it was!! Wow.

At Christmastime, I told my kids that shows like "Charlie Brown Christmas" were a real treat, as they were only on once a year, and if you missed it, you had to wait a whole year to see it again. I think these shows had more meaning because of that. Nowadays, most, or many shows are on repeatedly, so if you miss it once you can most likely catch it again very soon. Not to mention, nearly everything is available on DVD or online now to watch.

Times have definitely changed, but it does with each generation.

My brother shared that list with me today. It was a it depressing. I kept thinking of the movie Grownups where Adam Sandler kept making his kids play outside.

I saw that and thought it was kind of sad. Fortunately, a lot of kids still do play outside and are active outside the house; though with all this new technology more kids are spending more time indoors playing with electronics. Not that some of those can't be fun and give some exercise (some wii games do get kids moving, so that's good), but I think it's good to get out and get some fresh air, too. I hope it doesn't get to a point where kids don't go outside much anymore, but with sports and such, I don't think that will happen for a while. Not with all kids at least.

My nephew pointed out that in that movie (Grown Ups) that the kids were texting the maid. Poor maid, lol.

The only one I care about on that list is books. I don't want to buy a Nook or Kindle at all; I need to hold my paper book and turn the pages.

We like holding books here, too. We have quite a large collection, and I plan to keep buying them. I know reading books electronically is popular, but besides preferring holding an actual book, I always thought that it was 'safer' for me and my kids (not talking about anyone else) because if we accidentally lose a book, leave it behind, spill something on it, sit on it, or whatnot, we aren't out much money. Also, no need to worry about charging it, replacing batteries, or whatever is required for the Kindle & Nook. Lastly, sometimes computers malfunction, but books don't.

Again, I know they are very popular, and I'm glad people are enjoying them, and perhaps one day I will want and enjoy one. I'm just not interested--------yet. Maybe someday, but I think I'll always buy books with or without a Kindle or Nook. We also have dictionaries and encyclopedia's here... but I admit, I do use the computer to look most things up.

As for letters: I still correspond the old fashioned way with a few (very few!!) select people. There's something exciting about getting a real handwritten letter in the mailbox amongst the bills and junk mail. I admit, it's much easier to email, though. But, I'd like to keep writing, at least now and then.

Technology doesn't bother me much, but I suppose there are things I miss a little. It goes both ways, though---some things have made life much easier. I just hope we don't become too lazy or rely so heavily on computers that we don't know how to do anything by hand/the old fashioned way, if necessary. There are pros and cons to most things, and everybody's thoughts and feelings vary. To each his own :thumbsup2
 
Also, I can imagine that reading something for hours on a Nook or Kindle would make my eyes 'bug out' so to speak. But I've never even seen one so I might be wrong.
 
Also, I can imagine that reading something for hours on a Nook or Kindle for hours would make my eyes 'bug out' so to speak. But I've never even seen one so I might be wrong.

You might be surprised. I thought the same thing, until my daughter got a Nook and I tried it. I was very surprised how easy it is on the eyes.
 
WOW, that was so egocentric. Does the writer really believe the world is made up of nothing but upper middle class kids whose parents can afford this stuff? Newsflash, some people don't have computers and they will manage to have children and raise them just fine without these influences

I grew up poor and the only music I ever had was what played on the radio my Grandma got free from the bank. I was born in 1970 but this video is close enough:rotfl: Oddly enough I managed to have fun anyway:upsidedow

www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjg39XRkjVc
 
I love that list and I love that nearly every point on it is an improvement to society.
 
Congrats OP...you are officially old. Just like your parents before you and your grandparents before them, it si a rite-of-passage to complain about the new fangled technology when "there ain't nuttin' wrong with the way we do it now!".

There is not one thing on that list that I find to be a negative or a detriment to society. As for the article being "lazy"...can't say it's fit for the NY Times, but whatever.
 

New Posts


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom