jodifla
WDW lover since 1972
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2002
- Messages
- 11,605
I must beg to differ. I'll even admit to being a little offended at the "those women try to claim otherwise" comment.
I have also been both a working-outsite-the-home mom and a stay-at-home mom. I think which is easier depends on the circumstances. FOR ME: Going to my full time 35 hour per week, job as a victim advocate while my son was in daycare was so much easier than my first few years at home. I had newborn twins and a two year old. About a month into my "SAHM" status, I called my former boss and thanked him (a little jokingly) for that whole 30 minutes he used to give me to once a day to actually eat a meal. 'Cause, let me tell you, those days were long gone!
What's "easier" really is subjective.
I said "a lot of fronts," not all fronts.
And certainly having three small children changes the equation.
But when your kids get a little older, even around 3, being a SAHM isn't the cross between rocket science and the labor of Hercules thrown in with a little Mother Teresa some women want to make it out to be. I know since I currently am one. (A SAHM, not Mother Teresa.)
It's a nice lifestyle, frankly. There's a lot less pressure in the day, and things like having sick kids doesn't throw everyone into a tizzy.
But as I've mentioned before, it comes with severe financial tradeoffs that people should look down the road for. It's not shaving some expenses to live day by day, it's also how you are set for college costs and retirement.