I really don't want to get sucked into this, but if you are an "all school or nothing" person, do you have a special needs child? If you don't have one, you have no idea what it is like to teach or even exist on a daily basis with a child not receiving therapy. It is miserable. Thank God for Birth to Three and the school district (even though we did take preschool at one point). When I think of how frustrating it was for my dd before therapy, when she couldn't even communicate that she needed a drink (at age 2.5), I well up with tears. I have an MS Ed, and while I would be an excellent teacher for my dd, I am not a speech therapist. We are very fortunate to have insurance that covers speech, but before my dh got this job, our insurance did not cover speech. Speech is mandated coverage in my state, but the insurance was self-funded and therefore excluded from the mandate. Speech around here goes for $150-200/session. I could not afford that and would not have felt any shred of guilt for taking speech from the district. The resources are there for us to use. Why try to make someone feel guitly over it? We all do what is best for our families. I can completely understand how the OP feels with not wanting her ds to deal with the negative social ongoings. Especially with a SN child. Kids can be brutal, and when you have a hard time communicating, it can be even worse.
We almost took speech only from the new district we moved to. Their preschool was not a good fit for my dd. Unfortunately, when I called to inquire about the preschool, vital information was left out. We would never have moved into this district had we known the set up. We were lucky enough to be able to rearrange our budget and with some help from dh's grandfather, to put her in private school. We considered speech only until we gave up on the district, having seen 2 abuse incidents when were at the school for her transition and IEP meetings. I did not feel comfortable possibly putting her in a situation where something would happen and she not be able to communicate that to me.
Also, in my area, homeschooling is extremely popular. Many school districts have resources such as sports, electives, and classes for homeschoolers. I think it is a great way to enrich what I could teach my child (e.g. I could not teach algebra or geometry to save my life). Do you think these types of centers should be non-existant?
It's really sad to me that you are judging based on money. All of our kids are entitled to an education whether we teach and home and supplement with something the district offers or whether we send our kids to school and supplement by working with them at home.