cardaway said:The person who has exploited them the most lately... Oprah.
Unless of course she is donating all the profits to shelters for girls who can't help themselves because of the male machine.
cardaway said:A good amount of time was spent ripping on the people who run, or appear on, the Girls Gone Wild series. Which was the parts that Oprah should be nailed by the FCC for if the FCC has any credability and not just a case by case tool for somebody else in government, but I digress... These women didn't do anything they didn't want to yet it's the "male machine".
Is it really jealousy over the others looks? Upset that these women have control and they don't? I don't know, but it sure he looked like a new female version of the he-man woman haters club.
beckmrk04 said:She didn't blame all men- that wasn't the case AT ALL.
cardaway said:No, she invites guests to come and do that for her. Did you miss Dr. Robin's comments and Oprah agreeing to it all?
cardaway said:And BTW: how is it that she can play these vidoes with FCC banned words on them but when other shows dicuss what was said on her show, they have to bleep those words. Is Oprah above the FCC?![]()
littleclover said:this sounds more like an Oprah bashing thread instead of the real issue which is the state of our girls and the education system in our country today.
kdibattista said:Agreed... there is a complete double standard
cardaway said:I don't care for Oprah at all, but more often than not I think she's harmless.
Not this time. The whole episode was totally one sided (didn't admit that girls and women are actually doing better than boys and men in school) and seemed to be nothing but a division creating male bashing fest, but maybe you have to be male to see it that way.

cardaway said:The person who has exploited them the most lately... Oprah.
Unless of course she is donating all the profits to shelters for girls who can't help themselves because of the male machine.
cardaway said:I don't care for Oprah at all, but more often than not I think she's harmless.
Not this time. The whole episode was totally one sided (didn't admit that girls and women are actually doing better than boys and men in school) and seemed to be nothing but a division creating male bashing fest, but maybe you have to be male to see it that way.
beckmrk04 said:The GGW owner has made a fortune off of drunk girls parading themselves for no compensation, sometimes to find it (to their horror) on the internet or on a tv commercial later. It's disgusting. Why should he be making money off of this? AND- WHO IS BUYING IT? Men. Men who obviously think it's cool that drunk girls are being taken advantage of.
So yeah- I guess men are a little to blame. But we all have a responsibility to stand up and say, "Hey, this isn't right."

cardaway said:So you mention being drunk but only place the blame on men?
You are not going to get the men alive today to take the blame for how women have been acting for ages.
cardaway said:A good amount of time was spent ripping on the people who run, or appear on, the Girls Gone Wild series. Which was the parts that Oprah should be nailed by the FCC for if the FCC has any credability and not just a case by case tool for somebody else in government, but I digress... These women didn't do anything they didn't want to yet it's the "male machine".
Is it really jealousy over the others looks? Upset that these women have control and they don't? I don't know, but it sure he looked like a new female version of the he-man woman haters club.
beckmrk04 said:Of course, if you're biased against Oprah in the first place, you might be looking for every negative you can find instead of focusing on the issue of the show, which was girls parading their sexuality not for their OWN benefit, but for the benefit of men, and getting NOTHING in return.

cardaway said:They got exactly what they were looking for, attention. Shame on the men for giving it to them.![]()