In the 2'nd, still no score. Fast and furious and not so much biff-o as I thought it could have been. Seems like most of the players have focussed on the game.
For the preliminary round I think a shootout is fine. Maybe even the first game of the medals round. But I hope if the gold medal game is tied, they play straight 20 minute OT periods until someone scores.
Canadian fans might remember: In 1994, did Sweden beat Canada in a shootout or OT for the gold medal?
For the preliminary round I think a shootout is fine. Maybe even the first game of the medals round. But I hope if the gold medal game is tied, they play straight 20 minute OT periods until someone scores.
Canadian fans might remember: In 1994, did Sweden beat Canada in a shootout or OT for the gold medal?
For the preliminary round I think a shootout is fine. Maybe even the first game of the medals round. But I hope if the gold medal game is tied, they play straight 20 minute OT periods until someone scores.
Canadian fans might remember: In 1994, did Sweden beat Canada in a shootout or OT for the gold medal?
For the preliminary round I think a shootout is fine. Maybe even the first game of the medals round. But I hope if the gold medal game is tied, they play straight 20 minute OT periods until someone scores.
Canadian fans might remember: In 1994, did Sweden beat Canada in a shootout or OT for the gold medal?
Damn....I couldn't remember whether it was shootout or OT. So I suppose the same rule is still in effect.
Someone above mentioned the shootout as being a skills competition. I consider it more like a carnival sideshow. Tolerable for "regular season", but not for the finals.
I think the World Cup in soccer used shootouts to determine the 2006 and 1994 champions. A major reason lots of US fans consider soccer to be a bush league sport.