Tinkerbelle739 said:You dont have me fooled Be!!
Those are no beasts, just princesses in training!![]()
Oh, edited to add that your youngest may also be a Zeta girl in training with her Orange shoes!!
Tinkerbelle739 said:Oh, edited to add that your youngest may also be a Zeta girl in training with her Orange shoes!!
PurpleDuck said:Uh, Bella? Do you recall the shoe modeling show you gave Tinkabell and I in the Esplanade? Sorry to say, but this is where Tinkabell and I would have to say that those are a 'gold yellow' not orange and remind you to picture Tinkabell's shirt as a reference!![]()
![]()
surfcruiser said:In a nutshell (where did we get that phrase from?), we people types must talk and convey our moods, our ideas, our plans, and our state of general existence to each other. We must speak our intention to help someone in need or our displeasure with a 'taken' drone. We must. We are simply wired that way. And this has been seen since the dawn of time (pause while reflecting on Spaceship Earth ride in Epcot).
tigressjewel said:![]()
![]()
![]()
As for the rest of your ponderings.. thank you! It makes great reading material while "nedding"I heart it!
surfcruiser said:I am a scuba diver among other things, and while under water, the lack of air in the space we must communicate in necessitates an alternate form of communication with a sign language that has become so common to people of like hobby that I can flash an 'OK' sign to a dive friend sitting in the same above water room and he or she will know exactly what I am saying: 'I am in a satisfactory state of existence, my systems are all functioning properly, and my ears don't hurt.'
surfcruiser said:VMK-nese
surfcruiser said:But then, what words are considered vulgar? Most of us were brought up to know them, and I certainly won't attempt a list of them here or anywhere else as 1) this is a family oriented message board and 2) I personally think said vulgarities indicate a total lack of intelligence and an unlearned or lack of mastery of the English language.
hagen said:And I am also saying what we think is offensive today will be on Law and Order next week.
hagen
JeanJoe said:The opposite is also true -- I have it on good authority that the term 'hagen' will soon be considered quite vulgar.
hagen said:Fine... leave it to the English degree to have to take on this subject.
hagen said:Most of us were certainly brought up to recognize certain words and actions as being vulgar, certainly. However, the culture does not permit these to remain the "standards of debasement" for long, since so many of these inappropriate sayings and deeds have been absorbed into the vernacular through the pervasive media and the unrelenting population explosion. And time continues to remodel our vernacular to accommodate this ever-rolling tide. Consider that just eighty years ago, a female who's ankle was showing was thought of as scandalous, and sixty years ago that was the opinion of a female knee showing beneath a skirt. Now VMK has short skirts and exposed midriffs on the avatars. I won't use any grammatical examples so as not to offend any of you folks out there who still believe that a four-letter word is the verbal equivalent of clubbing baby seals while wearing a commie fur hat, but I do enjoin you to remember that what is crude language to us now will be seen as quaint to our grandchildren (for example, "egad" means nothing to us now, but search its etymology sometime... and consider that VMK allows us that blasphemy but will not let us say the word "God.").
And regarding the notion that vulgarities are an indication of a lesser grasp of the language, I must protest. Is that something people saw in Reader's Digest years ago and thought it seemed like a safe motto? "Dirty words" have always had a place in the common lexicon, and if you really believe they are a sign of a poor mastery of my beloved English language, please explain the anomalies of Shakespeare, Twain, Faulkner, Forster, Bradbury, Heller, Salinger, Steinbeck, Ginsburg, Morrison, Aristophanes... and plenty more can be found who have committed a vulgarity or two in their works. Besides that, the very word "vulgar" used to mean "characteristic of or belonging to the masses," back when the upper class was busy trying to keep the common folks down and out. It has since morphed into our colloquial speech as a term for "coarse language." Well, that just proves my point about how time changes our speech, doesn't it?
I'm not saying anyone needs to teach "four-letter words" to kids as they learn their ABCs, but I am saying that just because someone chooses to use such language does not mean they can't rub two words together. And I am also saying what we think is offensive today will be on Law and Order next week.
hagen