My nephew took ONE pacifier. Sister and BIL said they went through tons.![]()
those little things aren't cheap either. I must have spent at least 30$ on pacifiers he wont take...
My nephew took ONE pacifier. Sister and BIL said they went through tons.![]()
I have read this entire thread...please tell me where someone said that. Not one person has advocated exhibitionism.![]()
Really? Then you might need some reading glasses- this bizarro thread has really outlived it purpose. And like I said before- I'm not interested in seeing the ta ta s- anywhere, for any reason and neither are my kids or DH etc. Grab a blanket-it's indecent. etc. etc. etc.
Really? Then you might need some reading glasses- this bizarro thread has really outlived it purpose. And like I said before- I'm not interested in seeing the ta ta s- anywhere, for any reason and neither are my kids or DH etc. Grab a blanket-it's indecent. etc. etc. etc.
Not that exhibitionism is completely wrong...I've seen some VERY beautiful portraits and artwork of mothers BFing hanging in museums and art galleries, not to mention all the nudes![]()
But, I guess that means that many don't go to museums either being that such things are disrespectful...
Really? Then you might need some reading glasses- this bizarro thread has really outlived it purpose. And like I said before- I'm not interested in seeing the ta ta s- anywhere, for any reason and neither are my kids or DH etc. Grab a blanket-it's indecent. etc. etc. etc.
Not to be snarky, but how do you get anything done? My son sucked on a pacifier probably half of his waking hours until he was about 6 months old.
Not that exhibitionism is completely wrong...I've seen some VERY beautiful portraits and artwork of mothers BFing hanging in museums and art galleries, not to mention all the nudes![]()
But, I guess that means that many don't go to museums either being that such things are disrespectful...
Really? Then you might need some reading glasses- this bizarro thread has really outlived it purpose. And like I said before- I'm not interested in seeing the ta ta s- anywhere, for any reason and neither are my kids or DH etc. Grab a blanket-it's indecent. etc. etc. etc.
WHAT?!?!? ****S BELONG IN HUSTLER, NOT MUSEUMS!![]()
![]()
Not to be rude, but if you are not interested in seeing them then why would you look? If you go to a store and you are not interested in looking at say the appliances then you don't look at them. You go to look at things you like. Same concept. I don't really think any nursing Mom is standing in front of you with her breast at eye level forcing you or your family to look.![]()
My parents bought two pieces of art for their home that depicted a woman breastfeeding her child. One was a large print and the mother's hair is flowing everywhere. The other was a small statue showing the woman from the waist up. Both ****s out.
Should we cover up the Venus de Milo or the statue of David so as to not offend someone's delicate sensibilities? Or can we teach those people to not go look?
Not that exhibitionism is completely wrong...I've seen some VERY beautiful portraits and artwork of mothers BFing hanging in museums and art galleries, not to mention all the nudes![]()
But, I guess that means that many don't go to museums either being that such things are disrespectful...
I painted neon targets on each of mine before I went out.![]()
And *gasp* all the paintings of the Virgin Mary BF newborn Jesus. Cover your eyes...the ****ies are coming.
My parents bought two pieces of art for their home that depicted a woman breastfeeding her child. One was a large print and the mother's hair is flowing everywhere. The other was a small statue showing the woman from the waist up. Both ****s out.
Should we cover up the Venus de Milo or the statue of David so as to not offend someone's delicate sensibilities? Or can we teach those people to not go look?
Well if I were David, personally, I'd be covering that stuff up. Just sayin.'![]()