I'll agree that some of the regional high school districts have grown too large (thinking Freehold Regional and Lenape Regional). We need to move toward K-12 districts throughout the state. The k-8 and 9-12 district model that is so prevalent in the state is what is killing us.
There's no reason why some of the larger regional high school districts couldn't be broken down into smaller districts, but combine them with their smaller k-8 sending districts to provide for better continuity of services and fiscal efficiency.
For example, Rancocas Valley Regional High School District receives students from Lumberton, Mount Holly, Westampton, Eastampton, and Hainesport. The superintendent at RV makes $156,555 ('08-'09) for heading 1 school with approximately 2400 students. The Lumberton superintendent makes $175,998 ('08-'09) for heading 4 schools with approximately 1800 students. Mount Holly has 3 schools with approx. 1000 students and pays its superintendent $125,000. Westampton has 2 schools, approx. 950 students and pays its superintendent $143,853. Hainesport - 1 school, 700 students, superintendent salary $125, 167. Eastampton has 1 school, 750 students, salary $124,622.
That's a total of $851,195 for superintendents covering approx. 7600 students in 12 schools. Move across the river to Pennsylvania, where consolidation was mandated over 50 years ago, and compare the Neshaminy School District's figures. 9500 students in 13 schools. Superintendent's salary...a whopping $169,950! A difference of $681,245!!
Of course, it's not a perfect comparison, but it does highlight the savings that can be had if consolidation of services takes place.