JerseyJanice
A Disboards original...
- Joined
- Aug 20, 1999
- Messages
- 10,764
Haven't read the thread, but I know a lot about this topic from the inside.
Bottomline--Christie is a union buster and the first union he's doing battle with is the NJEA. He asked them for a 1.5% contribution to medical benefits, and they said no. It isn't the 1.5% so much as it is the union hanging tough. NJEA figures if it gives in on the 1.5%, he'll keep asking for more concessions. But now that he's not getting the 1.5% he asked for, he's cutting state aid to districts. That's really what this whole thing is about.
Personally, I don't know how to feel about it. I would pay the 1.5% and would prefer to do so over seeing colleagues get laid off and programs cut, but I do understand why the union is taking a tough stance.
Another thing is that many districts do have fat they can cut. In the current economic climate, taxpayers are not going to approve big property tax increases to make up for state aid being cut. Something has to give, and while painful, I think districts really need to examine where their dollars buy the most students the most benefits.
For example, do you have any idea what the tuition rates are for some private schools for the disabled? In many cases, it's $90,000+ a year per student. The districts pay that and then another $25,000 a year to transport students to these schools. This is one example that I see firsthand. The more a district does to integrate special ed students into general ed schools, the more money it saves.
I also think Admin Code needs to change so that kids go to school strictly for education. Example--character education--that one really gets my goat; I send my child to school to become literate, not to be taught morals. Code needs to make education the primary emphasis in schools. That sounds like a no-brainer, but...
Bottomline--Christie is a union buster and the first union he's doing battle with is the NJEA. He asked them for a 1.5% contribution to medical benefits, and they said no. It isn't the 1.5% so much as it is the union hanging tough. NJEA figures if it gives in on the 1.5%, he'll keep asking for more concessions. But now that he's not getting the 1.5% he asked for, he's cutting state aid to districts. That's really what this whole thing is about.
Personally, I don't know how to feel about it. I would pay the 1.5% and would prefer to do so over seeing colleagues get laid off and programs cut, but I do understand why the union is taking a tough stance.
Another thing is that many districts do have fat they can cut. In the current economic climate, taxpayers are not going to approve big property tax increases to make up for state aid being cut. Something has to give, and while painful, I think districts really need to examine where their dollars buy the most students the most benefits.
For example, do you have any idea what the tuition rates are for some private schools for the disabled? In many cases, it's $90,000+ a year per student. The districts pay that and then another $25,000 a year to transport students to these schools. This is one example that I see firsthand. The more a district does to integrate special ed students into general ed schools, the more money it saves.
I also think Admin Code needs to change so that kids go to school strictly for education. Example--character education--that one really gets my goat; I send my child to school to become literate, not to be taught morals. Code needs to make education the primary emphasis in schools. That sounds like a no-brainer, but...