Moliphino
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2016
- Messages
- 11,962
Agreed. The school district/PTO/whoever made the decision is in the wrong. But perhaps sending a bill, the legally allowed solution, wasn't the best solution. That's all. If it truly was a first offense from that district, a letter detailing the law and offering a solution going forward if they want to show a licensed movie again might have been a better move than a bill going backward.
Simply from the PR perspective of big company/public school, the big company is going to come out with egg on their face. Which is exactly what happened. And then Iger paid the bill, which was a good call, but the "after" is rarely as useful in PR purposes as the "original". Overall, this cost more to Disney than the $250 was worth.
I expect Disney, and Movie Licensing USA, will amend their procedures going forward. Just because you are in the right doesn't mean you made the correct choice. That being said, because you made a fuss and got away with being in the wrong, doesn't mean you should be rewarded going forward either.
It kind of is what they got, an explanation and a warning. Just asking them to pay retroactively is the nice way to do it (they also told them of the annual license option). The bad way to go about it would be to sue them right off the bat for copyright infringement rather than giving them a chance to make it right. Not sure why someone should get a pass for violating the law just because they spin it to make the other side look bad.