Keels
The Official Keels of RunDisney
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2008
- Messages
- 7,366
you wouldn't own all the content. but espn could offer streaming service for sports. funny that they are losing subscribers but that means that the millenials aren't that into sports since espn has baseball basketball and of course football including college bowl games, the playoffs and championship game. the only thing they haven't had was the superbowl.
They can't offer streaming presentations of sporting events they don't have the rights to. Personally, as a partial cord-cutter (we have satellite here in Texas but not in our house in Florida), I'm not going to pay a single dime to ESPN for their coverage of sports or original programming (including "30 for 30", which I think is the only decent original program they do). I pay for direct coverage from the league's themselves (MLB, NBA and NFL). If I'm watching analysis of sports, I'm watching intelligent analysis by people I view to be as experts in their field - not a bunch of talking heads that just want to scream hyperbole at each other or just throw ridiculous crap against the wall to see what they can drive as clickbait on their website.
ESPN is like the second-highest channel offering for satellite/cable carriers - almost as much as HBO, etc., short of being a premium channel.
If Disney is worried about ESPN just burning piles of cash and losing cord-cutters, they need to look at WHY cord-cutters aren't sticking with the online product they offer - and it goes across the board, from their high-priced "talent" to their exclusive sports contracts to platform. In my opinion - it's not just one rotten egg (cord-cutting) that's killing ESPN, it's a dozen rotten eggs.