No it's not very futuristic. Much better fit in fantasyland or DHS.I haven't seen the movie yet <gasp> but based on the trailers, I see it fitting decently well in either future world at Epcot or Tomorrowland at MK.
No it's not very futuristic. Much better fit in fantasyland or DHS.I haven't seen the movie yet <gasp> but based on the trailers, I see it fitting decently well in either future world at Epcot or Tomorrowland at MK.
No it's not very futuristic. Much better fit in fantasyland or DHS.
It's a really good movie.Okay. I really need/want to see it! lol
And personally, I think it's far better than Jungle Book from an overall appeal level...never cared for the music in the original JB, and the fact that they felt there needed to be songs in an otherwise great movie, I think was a mistake. Love Love Love Zootopia!It's a really good movie.
See I was a big fan of the original jungle book and I loved the new one. Zootopia is a different movie altogether.And personally, I think it's far better than Jungle Book from an overall appeal level...never cared for the music in the original JB, and the fact that they felt there needed to be songs in an otherwise great movie, I think was a mistake. Love Love Love Zootopia!
Stockholm syndrome
News
Apparently executives aren't thrilled with Rogue One.
http://wdwnt.com/blog/2016/05/disney-not-happy-with-first-cut-of-rogue-one-a-star-wars-story/
May I ask why?
Who sends a movie off *expecting* to come back and do reshoots? Specifically "4 weeks of expensive reshoots"... I can't say i'd be too keen to work with a director who "expects" to work that way..
The rockwork covering in the waterfall opening looks fine ... though kinda surprised it's not part of the new ride.
The white and orangish rectangles stick out like a sore thumb ... jarring from the surroundings and NOT in a "hey, wow, cool, what's that over there" kinda way. It just doesn't seem to fit, at least not in the current state of those photos.
"A Disney source added, “The filmmaking team and the studio always anticipated additional shooting and second unit work to make the film the absolute best it can be, and the actors were aware there would be additional shooting."
Who sends a movie off *expecting* to come back and do reshoots? Specifically "4 weeks of expensive reshoots"... I can't say i'd be too keen to work with a director who "expects" to work that way.
Re-shoots are actually extremely common with movies. Most of the time they involve expositional scenes or scenes where they didn't get the shots they wanted, or as they cut the movie together determined an additional scene here and there. However, typically its something along the lines of 1-2 weeks. FOUR weeks of reshoots - if true - is rather a lot.
To me, Zootopia is one of those film properties that really doesn't have an ideal home in any of the parks (Talking about WDW here, since I've never been to DL). AK would be the closest fit because animals, but the overall themes between the two properties don't really mesh. MK could also be fine for a M&G, but again, it doesn't fit in any of the lands.
That really only leaves HS as a potential home, and that park is just a mess right now.
I disagree I think avatar fits quite well at AK with its conservation message.Having seen it, Zootopia fits as well in AK as Avatar...and it has the advantage of having animals as the main stars...the movie is not as great as its box office (I gave it a B+, but I am a harsher critic than most), but it has some of the funniest scenes I've seen in an animated movie in a long time, and good humor goes a long way to making a good movie experience...